Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Pranay Patel

Internal Medicine Spartanburg, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1194729715 CMS profile 235545

3070 Reidville Rd, Spartanburg, SC 29301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,067

438 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Pranay Patel of Spartanburg, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,067 across 438 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $799 46
2024 General $828 48
2023 General $981 60
2022 General $1,046 72
2021 General $1,107 71
2020 General $1,080 63
2019 General $1,225 78

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Pranay Patel
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Pranay Patel were reported at $799. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Pranay Patel Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,225 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,080 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,107 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,046 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $981 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $828 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $799 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,195 63 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,169 71 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $629 42 payments
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $598 44 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $565 35 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $384 24 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $328 21 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $295 19 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $217 17 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $205 11 payments
  11. Other $1,482 91 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,067 438 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,018 65 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $904 59 payments
  3. FARXIGA $754 44 payments
  4. Kerendia $598 44 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $327 22 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $258 15 payments
  7. EVENITY $241 14 payments
  8. Prolia $241 14 payments
  9. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $218 14 payments
  10. SYMBICORT $209 12 payments
  11. Other $4,911 305 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 146 drugs

Part D claims

9,018

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$843,139

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

27.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 126 $157,330
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 94 $126,750
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 98 $106,404
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 74 $88,561
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 20 $38,683
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 28 $28,819
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 26 $28,102
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 43 $23,985
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 18 $21,231
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 22 $21,046

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 146 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 61 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$101,366

Of which drugs: $8,140

Medicare patients

161

Average age 73

Services billed

2,923

94 women, 67 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 54%
Diabetes 51%
Arthritis 51%
Depression 28%
Osteoporosis 25%
Cancer 20%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 84 85 $6,680
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 13 79 $76
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 24 116 $59
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 25 136 $12

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $118
$118 98 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $110
$110 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $95
$95 126 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $78
$78 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $63
$63 94 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

438 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record