Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Peter Mathern

Medical Oncology Flagstaff, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1316995699 CMS profile 14268

77 W Forest Ave, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,069

731 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Peter Mathern of Flagstaff, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,069 across 731 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 70th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,044 123
2024 General $2,977 125
2023 General $2,777 142
2022 General $6,319 184
2021 General $137 2
2020 General $461 26
2019 General $2,354 129

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Peter Mathern
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Peter Mathern were reported at $3,044. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Peter Mathern Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,354 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $461 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $137 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $6,319 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $2,777 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $2,977 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $3,044 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,294 7 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,163 52 payments
  3. Veracyte, Inc. $994 2 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $961 43 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $897 32 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $879 44 payments
  7. Incyte Corporation $728 24 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $701 28 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $701 36 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $697 43 payments
  11. Other $9,053 420 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,288 713 payments
  2. Honoraria $2,070 2 payments
  3. Education $711 16 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Tavalisse $1,294 7 payments
  2. KEYTRUDA $1,151 51 payments
  3. JAKAFI $532 16 payments
  4. OPDIVO $514 29 payments
  5. VERZENIO $461 20 payments
  6. DARZALEX $431 16 payments
  7. XTANDI $404 21 payments
  8. Lenvima $373 18 payments
  9. RETEVMO $373 12 payments
  10. TUKYSA $317 14 payments
  11. Other $15,895 776 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

1,086

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$6,012,631

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

42.4%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 59 $817,110
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 44 $598,748
Lenalidomide Generic 46 $498,210
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 56 $473,625
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 21 $417,964
Lenvima Lenvatinib Mesylate Brand 15 $347,714
Erleada Apalutamide Brand 22 $324,951
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 19 $312,052
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 19 $273,749
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 13 $258,579

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 138 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$5,992,932

Of which drugs: $5,690,744

Medicare patients

651

Average age 74

Services billed

294,906

339 women, 312 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Cancer 55%
Arthritis 36%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Osteoporosis 16%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, pembrolizumab, 1 mg J9271 Office 18 18,800 $838,566
Injection, daratumumab, 10 mg and hyaluronidase-fihj J9144 Office 13 20,160 $790,296
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 46 10,860 $222,332
Injection, pegfilgrastim-pbbk (fylnetra), biosimilar, 0.5 mg Q5130 Office 16 684 $107,115
Leuprolide acetate (for depot suspension), 7.5 mg J9217 Office 32 250 $34,659
Injection, aprepitant, 1 mg J0185 Office 22 12,350 $16,511
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 38 1,930 $1,346
Injection, carboplatin, 50 mg J9045 Office 12 407 $1,133
Injection, fosaprepitant, 1 mg J1453 Office 12 7,950 $945
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 13 76 $287

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 76 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEYTRUDA
$184 — —
ENHERTU
$125 — —
TIVDAK
$112 — —
VERZENIO
$107 16 —
OPDIVO
$102 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 76 with Patron

Records

731 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record