Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Patrick Timms

Rheumatology Pueblo, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1861455099 CMS profile 39308

3676 Parker Blvd, Pueblo, CO 81008

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,878

999 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Patrick Timms of Pueblo, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,878 across 999 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,064 180
2024 General $3,024 193
2023 General $2,478 161
2022 General $1,798 122
2021 General $1,728 122
2020 General $1,292 91
2019 General $1,494 130

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Patrick Timms
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Patrick Timms were reported at $3,064. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Patrick Timms Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,494 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,292 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,728 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,798 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,478 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,024 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,064 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,417 320 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,731 228 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,029 75 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $964 46 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $922 44 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $746 61 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $671 38 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $459 26 payments
  9. Horizon Therapeutics plc $401 21 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $378 19 payments
  11. Other $2,159 121 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,542 992 payments
  2. Education $336 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $3,208 239 payments
  2. Otezla $1,074 71 payments
  3. SAPHNELO $922 44 payments
  4. XELJANZ $710 59 payments
  5. COSENTYX Dermatology $673 49 payments
  6. TREMFYA $620 26 payments
  7. Enbrel $618 48 payments
  8. COSENTYX Immunology $475 36 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $459 26 payments
  10. SIMPONI ARIA $451 26 payments
  11. Other $8,053 546 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 69 drugs

Part D claims

8,475

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$10,464,865

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

33.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 307 $2,278,662
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 286 $1,875,212
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 199 $1,848,805
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 98 $574,567
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 23 $499,101
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 82 $465,458
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 73 $317,740
Humira Adalimumab Brand 24 $316,905
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 49 $286,657
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 38 $282,285

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 69 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 81 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$550,536

Of which drugs: $408,722

Medicare patients

1,279

Average age 72

Services billed

49,730

912 women, 367 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 66%
High blood pressure 63%
Diabetes 25%
Osteoporosis 25%
Depression 22%
COPD 20%
Ischemic heart disease 16%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 113 11,880 $243,892
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 73 312 $209

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$743 286 —
SKYRIZI
$272 23 —
COSENTYX
$260 50 —
SAPHNELO
$244 — —
XELJANZ
$234 180 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

999 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record