Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Patrick Tang

Hematology & Oncology Great Falls, MT Medical Doctor

NPI 1316109739 CMS profile 827042

1117 29Th St S, Benefis Sletten Cancer Center, Great Falls, MT 59405

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,572

417 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$55,714 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Patrick Tang of Great Falls, MT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,572 across 417 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $55,714 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 64th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,675 88
2024 General $1,119 73
2023 General $801 54
2022 General $1,288 85
2021 General $504 27
2020 General $342 21
2019 General $845 69

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Patrick Tang
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Patrick Tang were reported at $1,675. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Patrick Tang Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $845 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $342 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $504 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $1,288 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $801 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $1,119 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $1,675 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $632 43 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $561 24 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $534 37 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $523 47 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $488 39 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $423 25 payments
  7. Incyte Corporation $315 18 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $315 17 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $285 18 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $218 14 payments
  11. Other $2,279 135 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,151 409 payments
  2. Education $421 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $612 41 payments
  2. IMFINZI $351 9 payments
  3. OPDIVO $306 24 payments
  4. LYNPARZA $292 18 payments
  5. XTANDI $267 23 payments
  6. TALZENNA $197 17 payments
  7. WELIREG $169 11 payments
  8. TECENTRIQ $164 8 payments
  9. SCEMBLIX $160 7 payments
  10. JAKAFI $154 12 payments
  11. Other $6,060 412 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

896

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$876,460

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

26%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nubeqa Darolutamide Brand 15 $202,256
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 12 $176,446
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 20 $148,608
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 14 $92,603
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 84 $79,847
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 11 $55,329
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 48 $44,014
Orgovyx Relugolix Brand 16 $40,313
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 18 $21,346
Exemestane Generic 17 $3,512

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$137,336

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

459

Average age 73

Services billed

1,924

223 women, 236 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Cancer 54%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 31%
COPD 24%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 22%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 44 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $81
$81 — —
LYNPARZA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $38
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $29
$68 — —
IMFINZI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $59
$59 — —
ORGOVYX
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $41
  • PFIZER INC. $16
$57 16 —
JAKAFI
  • Incyte Corporation $52
$52 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 44 with Patron

Records

417 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Montana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record