Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Omar On

Physician Assistant Chico, CA Physician Assistant

NPI 1295889871 CMS profile 13884

251 Cohasset Rd, Suite 240, Chico, CA 95926

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$63,449

1,071 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Omar On of Chico, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $63,449 across 1,071 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,295 128
2024 General $16,730 233
2023 General $17,722 259
2022 General $20,034 229
2021 General $6,669 222

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Omar On
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Omar On were reported at $2,295. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Omar On Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $6,669 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $20,034 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $17,722 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $16,730 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $2,295 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Incyte Corporation $31,018 127 payments
  2. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $13,082 155 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $7,675 192 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,691 106 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,232 72 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,103 36 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $926 50 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $873 39 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $748 52 payments
  10. Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc. $650 1 payment
  11. Other $4,451 241 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $26,750 18 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $17,704 1,018 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $10,263 20 payments
  4. Honoraria $5,850 3 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $2,202 3 payments
  6. Education $681 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. OPZELURA $30,923 126 payments
  2. Winlevi $11,633 54 payments
  3. RINVOQ $5,728 54 payments
  4. Absorica LD $1,798 48 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $1,440 99 payments
  6. DUPIXENT $1,339 52 payments
  7. ILUMYA $1,305 91 payments
  8. Otezla $1,210 71 payments
  9. TREMFYA $1,205 80 payments
  10. TALTZ $827 49 payments
  11. Other $11,049 606 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

1,282

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$579,182

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

13.3%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 12 $242,237
Otezla Apremilast Brand 24 $145,201
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 23 $145,072
Doxycycline Ir-Dr Doxycycline Monohydrate Brand 18 $14,910
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 112 $6,003
Metronidazole Generic 55 $5,158
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 109 $2,963
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 46 $2,514
Fluorouracil Generic 38 $2,450
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 194 $2,377

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$410,549

Of which drugs: $13,154

Medicare patients

1,856

Average age 74

Services billed

12,624

909 women, 947 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 64%
Arthritis 35%
Diabetes 19%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Cancer 13%
Depression 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 23 40 $12,281
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 119 1,213 $873

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OPZELURA
$7,879 — —
RINVOQ
$5,240 — —
YCANTH
$650 — —
DUPIXENT
$381 — —
SKYRIZI
$295 12 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

1,071 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record