Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Noor Sachdev

Neurology San Jose, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1710141072 CMS profile 349606

2520 Samaritan Dr Ste 201B, San Jose, CA 95124

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$282,197

1,634 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Noor Sachdev of San Jose, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $282,197 across 1,634 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $73,991 268
2024 General $39,657 214
2023 General $39,794 252
2022 General $38,338 217
2021 General $50,396 327
2020 General $17,560 164
2019 General $22,461 192

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Noor Sachdev
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Noor Sachdev were reported at $73,991. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Noor Sachdev Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $22,461 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $17,560 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $50,396 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $38,338 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $39,794 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $39,657 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $73,991 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $117,760 199 payments
  2. Argenx US, Inc. $31,120 57 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $25,306 56 payments
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $20,859 74 payments
  5. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $17,152 29 payments
  6. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $13,961 96 payments
  7. Lundbeck LLC $12,340 72 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $9,532 39 payments
  9. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. $6,456 5 payments
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $5,665 9 payments
  11. Other $22,047 998 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $191,058 103 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $32,989 1,449 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $27,083 13 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $23,350 55 payments
  5. Honoraria $7,250 4 payments
  6. Education $468 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $96,746 139 payments
  2. QULIPTA $62,002 100 payments
  3. VYVGART $28,723 36 payments
  4. AIMOVIG $25,170 55 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $22,817 38 payments
  6. AJOVY $20,176 53 payments
  7. VYEPTI $12,030 52 payments
  8. KISUNLA $8,537 12 payments
  9. ULTOMIRIS $7,358 38 payments
  10. Soliris $2,796 45 payments
  11. Other $25,209 1,152 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

1,566

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,115,329

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

17.6%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Panzyga Immun Glob G(Igg)-Ifas/Glycine Brand 18 $544,141
Privigen Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 19 $261,489
Gamunex-C Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 12 $129,015
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 11 $53,758
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 64 $48,994
Rivastigmine Generic 54 $13,572
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 12 $13,242
Lacosamide Generic 48 $8,893
Emgality Syringe Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 11 $7,558
Memantine Hcl Generic 108 $5,294

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 23 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$243,979

Of which drugs: $71,915

Medicare patients

383

Average age 77

Services billed

16,259

210 women, 173 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Alzheimer's or dementia 45%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 28%
Osteoporosis 23%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Depression 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 24 15,000 $71,915

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 43 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
$15,433 — —
QULIPTA
$14,206 — —
VYEPTI
$6,159 — —
ULTOMIRIS
$319 — —
KESIMPTA
$278 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 43 with Patron

Records

1,634 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record