Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Noel Laudi

Medical Oncology Coon Rapids, MN Medical Doctor

NPI 1235221110 CMS profile 283302

11850 Blackfoot St Nw Ste 300, Coon Rapids, MN 55433

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$273,634

350 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$7,622 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2023

Through program year 2025, Noel Laudi of Coon Rapids, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $273,634 across 350 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $7,622 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $156 6
2024 General $1,375 3
2023 General $41,980 55
2022 General $45,297 55
2021 General $88,640 112
2020 General $35,230 30
2019 General $60,957 89

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Noel Laudi
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Noel Laudi were reported at $156. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Noel Laudi Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $60,957 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $35,230 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $88,640 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $45,297 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $41,980 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $1,375 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $156 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Incyte Corporation $56,560 90 payments
  2. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $53,844 36 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $43,612 54 payments
  4. BeiGene USA, Inc. $31,706 34 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $22,048 28 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $20,791 36 payments
  7. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $19,723 23 payments
  8. Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company $9,911 22 payments
  9. Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc $4,800 11 payments
  10. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. $2,625 1 payment
  11. Other $8,014 15 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $208,660 100 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $34,782 133 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $21,448 17 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $5,605 87 payments
  5. Honoraria $2,825 2 payments
  6. Education $195 10 payments
  7. Grant $120 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MONJUVI $56,560 90 payments
  2. NINLARO $33,961 22 payments
  3. BRUKINSA $32,156 35 payments
  4. KEYTRUDA $20,236 20 payments
  5. ENHERTU $19,523 22 payments
  6. LYNPARZA $18,858 24 payments
  7. ALUNBRIG $14,888 9 payments
  8. IMBRUVICA Oncology $13,726 24 payments
  9. Imbruvica Oncology $9,911 22 payments
  10. DARZALEX $6,215 10 payments
  11. Other $28,484 46 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 32 drugs

Part D claims

1,377

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$1,252,148

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

22.7%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 42 $439,141
Ojjaara Momelotinib Dihydrochloride Brand 13 $376,438
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 11 $186,336
Sprycel Dasatinib Brand 12 $119,538
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 67 $59,792
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 41 $44,336
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 19 $9,792
Dexamethasone Generic 107 $2,795
Imatinib Mesylate Generic 18 $2,193
Acyclovir Generic 157 $1,334

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 32 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$28,558

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

143

Average age 72

Services billed

373

78 women, 65 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 41%
Cancer 40%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Depression 34%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Diabetes 28%
Atrial fibrillation 25%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RYBREVANT
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $850
$850 — —
CALQUENCE
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $525
$525 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

350 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record