Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nicole Borst

Rheumatology Ocala, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1659429173 CMS profile 1207311

3210 Sw 33Rd Rd Ste 102, Ocala, FL 34474

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,823

803 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nicole Borst of Ocala, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,823 across 803 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,408 164
2024 General $3,274 176
2023 General $2,804 151
2022 General $2,724 145
2021 General $1,649 110
2020 General $335 20
2019 General $629 37

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nicole Borst
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nicole Borst were reported at $3,408. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Nicole Borst Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $629 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $335 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,649 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,724 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,804 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,274 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,408 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,908 148 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,503 149 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,067 110 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,560 102 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,145 79 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $931 34 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $713 31 payments
  8. Horizon Therapeutics plc $565 23 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $547 32 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $500 22 payments
  11. Other $1,383 73 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,307 796 payments
  2. Education $516 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,494 123 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,918 96 payments
  3. XELJANZ $1,112 77 payments
  4. Cimzia $977 69 payments
  5. SIMPONI ARIA $911 52 payments
  6. Otezla $857 54 payments
  7. SAPHNELO $843 31 payments
  8. Enbrel $808 45 payments
  9. ACTHAR $713 31 payments
  10. Bimzelx $583 33 payments
  11. Other $7,150 407 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

1,554

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,690,949

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

38%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 70 $618,687
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 73 $442,510
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 27 $209,844
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 24 $206,731
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 12 $79,744
Prolia Denosumab Brand 40 $70,380
Evenity (2 Syringes) Romosozumab-Aqqg Brand 15 $36,932
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 329 $10,111
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 78 $3,479
Celecoxib Generic 100 $2,665

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,254,985

Of which drugs: $1,118,398

Medicare patients

390

Average age 74

Services billed

188,611

285 women, 105 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Diabetes 31%
Osteoporosis 30%
Depression 28%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
COPD 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 39 148,400 $536,392
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 12 5,575 $188,208
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 13 15,540 $132,169
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 39 3,480 $70,249
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 25 306 $157
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 13 140 $109

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $507
$507 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $408
$408 — —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $333
$333 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $273
$273 73 —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $230
$230 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

803 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record