Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nick Lee

Internal Medicine Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1598881179 CMS profile 27134

809 N Hill St, #K, Los Angeles, CA 90012

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$65,189

2,082 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$51,403 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Nick Lee of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $65,189 across 2,082 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $51,403 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,176 253
2024 General $6,164 229
2023 General $6,910 265
2022 General $8,363 311
2021 General $15,478 370
2020 General $9,016 325
2019 General $13,082 329

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nick Lee
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nick Lee were reported at $6,176. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Nick Lee Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $13,082 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $9,016 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $15,478 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $8,363 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $6,910 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $6,164 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $6,176 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $18,276 268 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $12,049 181 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $3,386 123 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $2,798 133 payments
  5. Amarin Pharma Inc. $2,503 127 payments
  6. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $2,294 173 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,020 84 payments
  8. IBSA Pharma Inc. $1,828 111 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $1,459 57 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,322 61 payments
  11. Other $17,256 764 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $47,492 2,055 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $16,121 19 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $1,536 2 payments
  4. Education $40 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $13,947 158 payments
  2. Otezla $8,849 50 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,808 76 payments
  4. Licart $1,806 110 payments
  5. BREZTRI $1,705 26 payments
  6. Repatha $1,567 71 payments
  7. Vascepa $1,449 90 payments
  8. XIFAXAN $1,400 83 payments
  9. Prolia $1,399 71 payments
  10. EVENITY $1,357 75 payments
  11. Other $44,250 2,043 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 247 drugs

Part D claims

22,534

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$4,456,801

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

35.2%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 446 $298,439
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 730 $296,904
Licart Diclofenac Epolamine Brand 225 $261,359
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 340 $254,588
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 153 $211,282
Prolia Denosumab Brand 106 $176,949
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 234 $165,321
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 193 $132,414
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 213 $127,522
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 120 $121,804

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 247 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$457,262

Of which drugs: $399

Medicare patients

590

Average age 79

Services billed

11,169

369 women, 221 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 64%
COPD 59%
Diabetes 53%
Osteoporosis 51%
Chronic kidney disease 47%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Alzheimer's or dementia 30%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 55 323 $241
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 24 70 $28

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 45 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
$530 446 —
AIRSUPRA
$459 15 —
BREZTRI
$425 158 —
LEQVIO
$289 — —
VOQUEZNA
$288 44 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 45 with Patron

Records

2,082 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record