Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nicholas Thomson

Hematology & Oncology American Fork, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1891106936 CMS profile 1071936

1152 E 200 N, American Fork, UT 84003

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,249

717 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nicholas Thomson of American Fork, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,249 across 717 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,762 167
2024 General $9,101 169
2023 General $4,048 158
2022 General $2,068 112
2021 General $1,170 63
2020 General $672 33
2019 General $428 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nicholas Thomson
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nicholas Thomson were reported at $3,762. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Nicholas Thomson Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $428 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $672 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $1,170 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $2,068 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $4,048 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $9,101 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $3,762 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $6,735 35 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,515 68 payments
  3. Incyte Corporation $1,279 22 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,004 79 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $944 49 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $719 36 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $592 22 payments
  8. EMD Serono, Inc. $589 26 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $534 27 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $517 20 payments
  11. Other $6,820 333 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,848 693 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $7,104 7 payments
  3. Education $798 12 payments
  4. Long term medical supply or device loan $499 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JAKAFI $1,097 16 payments
  2. KISQALI $977 37 payments
  3. KEYTRUDA $690 34 payments
  4. Lenvima $489 28 payments
  5. ADCETRIS $424 26 payments
  6. OPDIVO $399 27 payments
  7. XTANDI $387 28 payments
  8. VERZENIO $379 17 payments
  9. ENHERTU $356 21 payments
  10. IMFINZI $337 17 payments
  11. Other $12,121 663 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

1,128

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$3,200,498

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

32.3%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 44 $682,568
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 40 $682,057
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 39 $464,102
Cabometyx Cabozantinib S-Malate Brand 11 $282,848
Lenalidomide Generic 23 $276,260
Kisqali Femara Co-Pack Ribociclib Succinate/Letrozole Brand 19 $264,499
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 11 $178,219
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 13 $176,068
Inqovi Decitabine/Cedazuridine Brand 15 $122,806
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 48 $41,889

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 137 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,953,728

Of which drugs: $1,853,156

Medicare patients

284

Average age 75

Services billed

91,132

183 women, 101 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 42%
Cancer 39%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Depression 28%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Osteoporosis 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 43 9,060 $185,533
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 25 139 $626
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 12 36 $24

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 58 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JAKAFI
$880 11 —
ENHERTU
$245 — —
Lenvima
$186 — —
KISQALI
$150 32 —
KEYTRUDA
$144 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 58 with Patron

Records

717 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record