Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nehal Modh

Pain Medicine Festus, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1619081890 CMS profile 254858

1145B E Gannon Dr, Festus, MO 63028

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,690

1,044 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nehal Modh of Festus, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,690 across 1,044 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,296 91
2024 General $1,547 107
2023 General $2,130 123
2022 General $3,306 177
2021 General $4,063 222
2020 General $2,483 168
2019 General $1,867 156

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nehal Modh
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nehal Modh were reported at $1,296. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Nehal Modh Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,867 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $2,483 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $4,063 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $3,306 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $2,130 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $1,547 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $1,296 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,762 224 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $2,506 176 payments
  3. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,861 127 payments
  4. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $898 61 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $842 83 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $633 39 payments
  7. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $598 43 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $580 33 payments
  9. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $520 28 payments
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $459 38 payments
  11. Other $3,031 192 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,690 1,044 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $3,748 170 payments
  2. RELISTOR $1,738 126 payments
  3. QULIPTA $1,351 65 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $979 66 payments
  5. AIMOVIG $758 42 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT Pain $747 77 payments
  7. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $675 50 payments
  8. PROCLAIM $658 34 payments
  9. TROKENDI XR $598 43 payments
  10. ZAVZPRET $582 67 payments
  11. Other $7,174 539 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 52 drugs

Part D claims

7,988

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$555,188

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

54.9%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 93 $103,400
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 178 $98,374
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 48 $53,668
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 1,938 $45,466
Relistor Methylnaltrexone Bromide Brand 14 $32,714
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 1,566 $30,210
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 128 $25,465
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 23 $25,421
Horizant Gabapentin Enacarbil Brand 22 $17,110
Pregabalin Generic 1,130 $15,628

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 52 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 23 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$135,510

Of which drugs: $1,154

Medicare patients

125

Average age 63

Services billed

1,720

64 women, 61 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Depression 49%
COPD 43%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Heart failure 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 85 218 $1,153

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RELISTOR
$305 14 —
QULIPTA
$280 23 —
BELBUCA
$227 178 —
ZAVZPRET
$162 — —
UBRELVY
$155 48 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,044 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record