Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anne Christopher

Pain Medicine Chesterfield, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1598709073 CMS profile 343992

121 Saint Lukes Center Dr, Ste 403, Chesterfield, MO 63017

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$104,483

701 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$17,589

Paid to them · 141 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,134,059 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Anne Christopher of Chesterfield, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $104,483 across 701 general payments and $17,589 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,134,059 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $13,378 109
2024 General $14,905 116
2023 General $7,702 101
2022 General $15,325 116
2021 General $9,017 76
2020 General $1,951 54
2020 Research $6,918 13
2019 General $42,204 129
2019 Research $10,671 128

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anne Christopher
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anne Christopher were reported at $13,378. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Anne Christopher Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $42,204 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $1,951 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $9,017 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $15,325 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $7,702 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $14,905 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $13,378 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Stimwave Technologies Incorporated $35,751 80 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $30,107 311 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $11,159 96 payments
  4. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $8,401 42 payments
  5. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $4,464 39 payments
  6. SI-BONE, Inc. $3,369 18 payments
  7. Vertiflex, Inc. $2,593 14 payments
  8. US WorldMeds, LLC $2,337 3 payments
  9. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $1,420 15 payments
  10. Foundation Fusion Solutions, LLC $1,406 26 payments
  11. Other $3,475 57 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $31,801 602 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $29,780 17 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $17,143 51 payments
  4. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $13,850 8 payments
  5. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $5,580 10 payments
  6. Entertainment $2,767 6 payments
  7. Gift $2,563 6 payments
  8. Honoraria $999 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $8,276 114 payments
  2. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $7,918 27 payments
  3. Prospera $7,623 25 payments
  4. PROCLAIM Structural Heart $5,955 27 payments
  5. SPECTRA WAVEWRITER $5,205 6 payments
  6. Intracept Pain $4,877 45 payments
  7. Superion ISS $2,593 14 payments
  8. MYOBLOC $2,337 3 payments
  9. PROCLAIM Neuromodulation $2,335 11 payments
  10. Intracept Pain $2,265 26 payments
  11. Other $25,332 373 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biotronik Inc. $17,589 141 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

1,870

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$27,759

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

32.4%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 453 $8,733
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 529 $4,738
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 140 $3,908
Pregabalin Generic 147 $3,022
Gabapentin Generic 98 $1,789
Lidocaine Generic 17 $1,162
Tramadol Hcl Generic 161 $1,150
Hydromorphone Hcl Generic 13 $839
Cephalexin Generic 76 $448
Baclofen Generic 30 $317

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$318,722

Of which drugs: $6,531

Medicare patients

429

Average age 75

Services billed

53,113

283 women, 146 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 33%
Diabetes 28%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Osteoporosis 22%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 266 48,826 $4,980
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 114 209 $1,510
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 18 270 $24

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

842 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record