Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Neha Pansuria

Rheumatology Bowling Green, KY Medical Doctor

NPI 1659534071 CMS profile 256981

2724 Nashville Rd, Bowling Green, KY 42101

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$39,129

1,107 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Neha Pansuria of Bowling Green, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $39,129 across 1,107 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $9,469 171
2024 General $6,354 191
2023 General $11,956 213
2022 General $4,628 167
2021 General $2,037 127
2020 General $2,760 108
2019 General $1,925 130

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Neha Pansuria
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Neha Pansuria were reported at $9,469. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Neha Pansuria Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,925 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,760 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,037 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $4,628 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $11,956 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $6,354 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $9,469 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $15,411 33 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $3,878 233 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $3,799 83 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $3,724 175 payments
  5. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC $1,903 11 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $1,810 112 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $1,221 60 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,016 59 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $942 51 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $738 48 payments
  11. Other $4,688 242 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,485 1,077 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $16,033 9 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,929 10 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $400 1 payment
  5. Education $283 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. OFEV $9,124 16 payments
  2. TREMFYA $3,288 44 payments
  3. RINVOQ $2,311 123 payments
  4. Otezla $1,223 65 payments
  5. ACTHAR $1,221 60 payments
  6. Cimzia $1,210 82 payments
  7. Enbrel $1,193 67 payments
  8. BENLYSTA $942 51 payments
  9. Prolia $933 62 payments
  10. EVENITY $817 55 payments
  11. Other $12,826 690 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

4,070

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$3,011,831

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

35.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 164 $1,193,199
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 75 $573,403
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 42 $295,243
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 43 $276,477
Otezla Apremilast Brand 24 $113,258
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 14 $107,383
Cyltezo(Cf) Pen Adalimumab-Adbm Brand 13 $90,418
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 11 $81,548
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 14 $79,410
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 16 $76,876

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 137 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$990,134

Of which drugs: $797,058

Medicare patients

450

Average age 72

Services billed

71,254

328 women, 122 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 34%
Depression 32%
Osteoporosis 32%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
COPD 24%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 15 10,100 $342,460
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 18 3,710 $89,298
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 27 2,040 $41,628
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 74 616 $425

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$2,612 — —
RINVOQ
$456 43 —
SKYRIZI
$426 — —
Enbrel
$312 175 —
ACTHAR
$284 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

1,107 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record