Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nathaniel Schuster

Pain Medicine San Diego, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1861781205 CMS profile 2780861

200 W Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$336,582

511 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$29,821 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2023

Through program year 2025, Nathaniel Schuster of San Diego, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $336,582 across 511 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $29,821 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $25,808 29
2024 General $25,288 68
2023 General $96,860 99
2022 General $64,671 112
2021 General $50,103 74
2020 General $41,716 48
2019 General $32,136 81

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nathaniel Schuster
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nathaniel Schuster were reported at $25,808. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Nathaniel Schuster Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $32,136 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $41,716 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $50,103 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $64,671 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $96,860 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $25,288 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $25,808 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $123,181 165 payments
  2. Averitas Pharma Inc. $63,033 150 payments
  3. GRT US Holding, Inc. $58,749 122 payments
  4. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $58,350 1 payment
  5. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $17,498 18 payments
  6. H. Lundbeck A S $6,023 4 payments
  7. Eli Lilly and Company $3,000 1 payment
  8. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $1,853 2 payments
  9. Lundbeck LLC $1,750 1 payment
  10. Boston Scientific Corporation $692 11 payments
  11. Other $2,453 36 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $115,645 92 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $90,642 9 payments
  3. Honoraria $68,995 35 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $52,246 182 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $8,962 190 payments
  6. Grant $85 2 payments
  7. Education $8 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Qutenza $121,782 272 payments
  2. EMGALITY $68,341 75 payments
  3. XTAMPZA $58,350 1 payment
  4. BELBUCA $58,350 1 payment
  5. Nucynta $58,350 1 payment
  6. REYVOW $37,322 41 payments
  7. VYEPTI Neurology $6,023 4 payments
  8. Symbravo $1,813 1 payment
  9. VYEPTI Neurology $1,750 1 payment
  10. SPRINT PNS System $398 6 payments
  11. Other $2,370 35 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 3 drugs

Part D claims

51

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$37,151

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

100%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 27 $20,175
Emgality Syringe Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 11 $16,839
Rizatriptan Rizatriptan Benzoate Brand 13 $137

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 53 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$73,780

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

266

Average age 72

Services billed

1,081

170 women, 96 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Depression 38%
Osteoporosis 34%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Diabetes 22%
Heart failure 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Qutenza
  • Averitas Pharma Inc. $25,156
$25,156 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

511 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record