Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nathan Sneddon

Pain Medicine Spokane Valley, WA Medical Doctor

NPI 1427232925 CMS profile 1324273

1123 N Evergreen Rd, Spokane Valley, WA 99216

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,670

296 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$967,290

10 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Nathan Sneddon of Spokane Valley, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,670 across 296 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $967,290 across 10 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

12 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,189 28
2024 General $3,513 83
2023 General $1,706 35
2022 General $7,410 50
2021 General $1,430 29
2020 General $3,345 38
2019 General $1,078 33
2025 Ownership $220,474 2
2024 Ownership $220,474 2
2023 Ownership $189,421 2
2022 Ownership $189,421 2
2021 Ownership $147,500 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nathan Sneddon
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nathan Sneddon were reported at $1,189. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Nathan Sneddon Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,078 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $3,345 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $1,430 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $7,410 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $1,706 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $3,513 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $1,189 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $3,420 25 payments
  2. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $3,271 23 payments
  3. Nevro Corp. $2,958 66 payments
  4. Vertos Medical, Inc. $2,488 12 payments
  5. Stimwave Technologies Incorporated $1,692 14 payments
  6. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,457 45 payments
  7. MML US, Inc. $1,000 7 payments
  8. Stryker Corporation $898 5 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $459 19 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $239 15 payments
  11. Other $1,787 65 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,482 269 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $9,044 26 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $143 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PROCLAIM $2,694 12 payments
  2. Intracept Pain $2,544 23 payments
  3. mild Device Kit $2,488 12 payments
  4. Intracept Pain $1,732 9 payments
  5. SCS FreedonSpinal Cord Stimulator $1,656 12 payments
  6. CFNS StimQ Peripheral Nerve StimulatorSystem $1,556 8 payments
  7. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $1,402 29 payments
  8. Omnia $1,113 24 payments
  9. ReActiv8 $1,000 7 payments
  10. Intracept Pain $868 6 payments
  11. Other $7,615 191 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 6 drugs

Part D claims

108

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$1,121

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

24.1%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 31 $419
Rizatriptan Rizatriptan Benzoate Brand 12 $348
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 15 $127
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 14 $124
Cephalexin Generic 18 $52
Diazepam Generic 18 $50

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$319,621

Of which drugs: $5,291

Medicare patients

347

Average age 75

Services billed

5,802

194 women, 153 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Diabetes 28%
Depression 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Osteoporosis 23%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 175 2,869 $259
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 84 $62

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RELISTOR
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $136
$136 — —
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $126
$126 — —
DYSPORT
  • Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc $106
$106 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $44
$44 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $41
$41 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

296 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Washington

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record