Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Caroline Harstroem

Pain Medicine Everett, WA Medical Doctor

NPI 1396131975 CMS profile 8791961

3305 Nassau St Ste A, Everett, WA 98201

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$74,321

408 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$36,625 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Caroline Harstroem of Everett, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $74,321 across 408 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $36,625 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $30,542 73
2024 General $17,925 91
2023 General $16,430 139
2022 General $6,516 50
2021 General $2,365 45
2020 General $543 10

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Caroline Harstroem
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Caroline Harstroem were reported at $30,542. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Caroline Harstroem Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $543 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $2,365 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $6,516 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $16,430 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $17,925 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $30,542 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Nevro Corp. $25,800 126 payments
  2. Nalu Medical, Inc. $20,576 31 payments
  3. Globus Medical, Inc. $8,835 24 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $5,979 76 payments
  5. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $4,491 37 payments
  6. MML US, Inc. $3,717 27 payments
  7. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,527 21 payments
  8. SI-BONE, Inc. $789 15 payments
  9. Vertos Medical, Inc. $574 9 payments
  10. Foundation Fusion Solutions, LLC $518 5 payments
  11. Other $1,513 37 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $26,778 22 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $20,481 326 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $13,324 50 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $9,975 7 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $3,720 1 payment
  6. Entertainment $43 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Nalu Neurostimulation System $20,576 31 payments
  2. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $11,120 14 payments
  3. Omnia $10,641 55 payments
  4. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $8,760 21 payments
  5. ReActiv8 $3,717 27 payments
  6. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $3,379 47 payments
  7. Evoke SCS $3,217 22 payments
  8. PROCLAIM $2,963 30 payments
  9. ETERNA $1,343 18 payments
  10. Evoke $1,275 15 payments
  11. Other $6,676 121 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

1,705

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$102,093

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

36.6%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Buprenorphine Generic 123 $30,030
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 16 $13,609
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 18 $9,926
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 244 $6,970
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 171 $6,569
Buprenorphine-Naloxone Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl Brand 61 $6,268
Symproic Naldemedine Tosylate Brand 12 $5,460
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 340 $5,063
Buprenorphine Hcl Generic 96 $4,104
Pregabalin Generic 79 $2,577

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$78,113

Of which drugs: $2,896

Medicare patients

183

Average age 71

Services billed

1,163

112 women, 71 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 72%
Diabetes 37%
Depression 37%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Heart failure 18%
COPD 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 27 115 $87
Low osmolar contrast material, 200-299 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9966 Office 29 36 $9

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

408 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Washington

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record