Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nathan Morgan

Physician Assistant Las Vegas, NV Physician Assistant

NPI 1215364674 CMS profile 10534230

6460 Medical Center St Ste 350, Las Vegas, NV 89148

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$43,881

932 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nathan Morgan of Las Vegas, NV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $43,881 across 932 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,791 224
2024 General $12,289 334
2023 General $15,403 191
2022 General $5,482 135
2021 General $1,917 48

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nathan Morgan
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nathan Morgan were reported at $8,791. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Nathan Morgan Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $1,917 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $5,482 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $15,403 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $12,289 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $8,791 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $10,765 93 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $6,405 68 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $5,227 106 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $4,374 120 payments
  5. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $2,666 53 payments
  6. LEO Pharma Inc. $2,606 32 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,721 80 payments
  8. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $1,274 24 payments
  9. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,092 11 payments
  10. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $952 37 payments
  11. Other $6,798 308 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $19,330 17 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $18,980 885 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,738 8 payments
  4. Education $1,113 21 payments
  5. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $720 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Bimzelx $5,909 44 payments
  2. Zoryve $4,732 62 payments
  3. TREMFYA $4,503 120 payments
  4. VTAMA $2,876 63 payments
  5. SKYRIZI $2,271 59 payments
  6. ADBRY $1,671 27 payments
  7. CIBINQO $1,590 76 payments
  8. RINVOQ $1,126 27 payments
  9. DUPIXENT $899 45 payments
  10. WYNZORA $891 2 payments
  11. Other $10,073 526 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

1,138

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$648,052

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

7.7%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 15 $227,938
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 42 $150,586
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 15 $120,640
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 16 $109,675
Tacrolimus Generic 45 $8,202
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 94 $4,614
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 107 $4,104
Halobetasol Propionate Generic 44 $2,268
Metronidazole Generic 34 $2,240
Fluorouracil Generic 27 $2,190

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$192,074

Of which drugs: $3,021

Medicare patients

970

Average age 75

Services billed

8,153

444 women, 526 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 42%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Cancer 17%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Depression 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 25 53 $39

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Bimzelx
$3,513 — —
TREMFYA
$2,324 — —
VTAMA
$973 — —
CIBINQO
$777 — —
ADBRY
$613 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

932 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Nevada

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record