Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kyle MacHynia

Physician Assistant Stateline, NV Physician Assistant

NPI 1851848956 CMS profile 11055359

276 Kingsbury Grade, Suite 101, Stateline, NV 89449

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$119,020

1,040 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kyle MacHynia of Stateline, NV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $119,020 across 1,040 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $61,224 297
2024 General $42,391 327
2023 General $8,795 163
2022 General $4,324 155
2021 General $2,286 98

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kyle MacHynia
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kyle MacHynia were reported at $61,224. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Kyle MacHynia Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $2,286 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $4,324 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $8,795 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $42,391 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $61,224 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $62,926 164 payments
  2. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $17,464 61 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $13,177 219 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $5,549 99 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $4,485 52 payments
  6. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $2,178 44 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $2,139 29 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $1,755 84 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,628 43 payments
  10. LEO Pharma Inc. $1,423 40 payments
  11. Other $6,294 205 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $71,908 42 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $26,235 940 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $11,443 31 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $8,551 10 payments
  5. Education $875 16 payments
  6. Honoraria $8 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TREMFYA $63,039 158 payments
  2. RINVOQ $7,453 111 payments
  3. NEMLUVIO $5,785 16 payments
  4. DUPIXENT $4,215 60 payments
  5. SKYRIZI Immunology $3,359 23 payments
  6. EBGLYSS $3,234 24 payments
  7. SKYRIZI Immunology $2,082 68 payments
  8. SILIQ $1,810 18 payments
  9. OPZELURA $1,582 82 payments
  10. SOTYKTU $1,464 28 payments
  11. Other $12,749 556 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

1,016

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$451,969

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

16.1%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 60 $230,102
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 25 $204,596
Ketoconazole Generic 186 $3,306
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 197 $2,893
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 127 $2,022
Fluorouracil Generic 26 $1,701
Tacrolimus Generic 25 $1,399
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 46 $851
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 16 $830
Mometasone Furoate Generic 45 $782

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 61 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$243,780

Of which drugs: $64,085

Medicare patients

750

Average age 74

Services billed

6,858

396 women, 354 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 41%
Diabetes 19%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Osteoporosis 16%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 39 157 $106

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$24,912 — —
DUPIXENT
$2,090 60 —
SILIQ
$930 — —
SKYRIZI
$806 — —
RINVOQ
$710 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

1,040 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Nevada

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record