Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nathan Bibliowicz

Dermatology Clermont, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1447593686 CMS profile 1145077

1920 Don Wickham Dr Ste 330, Clermont, FL 34711

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,302

829 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Nathan Bibliowicz of Clermont, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,302 across 829 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,471 160
2024 General $3,142 175
2023 General $3,482 168
2022 General $1,958 112
2021 General $2,230 134
2020 General $1,099 53
2019 General $920 27

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nathan Bibliowicz
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nathan Bibliowicz were reported at $3,471. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Nathan Bibliowicz Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $920 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $1,099 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $2,230 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $1,958 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $3,482 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $3,142 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,471 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,328 173 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,788 104 payments
  3. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,154 63 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,115 55 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,102 56 payments
  6. LEO Pharma Inc. $853 31 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $831 51 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $777 40 payments
  9. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $682 25 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $632 31 payments
  11. Other $5,040 200 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,800 821 payments
  2. Education $503 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $2,663 158 payments
  2. SOTYKTU $1,115 55 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $806 51 payments
  4. TALTZ $762 39 payments
  5. VTAMA $718 28 payments
  6. ILUMYA $663 36 payments
  7. CIBINQO $641 46 payments
  8. DUPIXENT Immunology $606 25 payments
  9. LITFULO $575 38 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $531 27 payments
  11. Other $10,068 504 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 44 drugs

Part D claims

4,000

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$811,061

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

6.2%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 54 $218,573
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 20 $149,638
Otezla Apremilast Brand 22 $106,022
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 11 $104,096
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 23 $46,212
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 11 $41,324
Vtama Tapinarof Brand 27 $39,093
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 460 $16,850
Ketoconazole Generic 889 $14,329
Metronidazole Generic 176 $13,981

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 44 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 101 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$552,718

Of which drugs: $15,865

Medicare patients

1,541

Average age 76

Services billed

11,892

717 women, 824 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Diabetes 29%
Atrial fibrillation 22%
Depression 22%
COPD 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 16 24 $55
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 26 40 $24

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SOTYKTU
$517 — —
TREMFYA
$448 — —
VTAMA
$354 27 —
DUPIXENT
$191 65 —
ILUMYA
$189 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

829 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record