Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Minh Mach

Burbank, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1831298736 CMS profile 218689

201 S Buena Vista St, Suite 225, Burbank, CA 91505

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$558,784

2,308 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$90,940 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Minh Mach of Burbank, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $558,784 across 2,308 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $90,940 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $55,432 199
2024 General $72,538 287
2023 General $116,429 454
2022 General $114,221 422
2021 General $81,103 330
2020 General $70,920 340
2019 General $48,140 276

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Minh Mach
  • California median
  • Middle half of California
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Minh Mach were reported at $55,432. Among 98,626 California profiles paid that year, the median was $172 and the middle half received between $54 and $610.

Show as a table
Year Minh Mach California median Middle half National median
2019 $48,140 $161 $50–$652 $163
2020 $70,920 $114 $34–$392 $114
2021 $81,103 $137 $41–$509 $132
2022 $114,221 $152 $48–$573 $149
2023 $116,429 $162 $50–$581 $160
2024 $72,538 $162 $52–$583 $164
2025 $55,432 $172 $54–$610 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $398,640 832 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $52,579 128 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $39,273 112 payments
  4. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $32,033 141 payments
  5. Mannkind Corporation $12,592 225 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $3,967 38 payments
  7. IBSA Pharma Inc. $3,469 48 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,808 191 payments
  9. Dexcom, Inc. $1,886 77 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $1,746 36 payments
  11. Other $9,791 480 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $502,049 555 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $36,397 1,593 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $12,686 149 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $7,525 6 payments
  5. Education $69 4 payments
  6. Gift $59 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. MOUNJARO $172,194 272 payments
  2. JARDIANCE Diabetes $129,887 318 payments
  3. TRULICITY $69,617 170 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $42,496 98 payments
  5. FARXIGA $39,101 104 payments
  6. BAQSIMI $20,681 76 payments
  7. SOLIQUA 100/33 $10,693 40 payments
  8. TOUJEO $10,590 18 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $10,083 30 payments
  10. V-GO $6,718 9 payments
  11. Other $45,594 1,467 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 101 drugs

Part D claims

7,607

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$2,988,609

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

54.6%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 315 $380,663
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 245 $313,440
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 357 $284,087
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 219 $277,917
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 183 $158,696
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 165 $132,422
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 179 $127,778
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 140 $120,868
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 104 $111,963
Glyxambi Empagliflozin/Linagliptin Brand 106 $99,345

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 101 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 12 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$121,453

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

485

Average age 74

Services billed

1,372

301 women, 184 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Osteoporosis 23%
Heart failure 18%
Depression 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
$44,137 245 —
JARDIANCE
$23,080 357 —
AFREZZA
$1,062 19 —
Ozempic
$267 315 —
Kerendia
$169 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

2,308 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record