Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Miguel Chamah-Farre

General Practice Hialeah, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1912914698 CMS profile 131855

1800 W 68Th St, Suite 127, Hialeah, FL 33014

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,827

209 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$104,118 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2025

Through program year 2025, Miguel Chamah-Farre of Hialeah, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,827 across 209 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $104,118 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $665 16
2024 General $590 13
2023 General $265 8
2022 General $1,125 15
2021 General $2,509 34
2020 General $1,354 46
2019 General $2,319 77

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Miguel Chamah-Farre
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Miguel Chamah-Farre were reported at $665. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Miguel Chamah-Farre General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $2,319 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $1,354 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $2,509 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $1,125 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $265 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $590 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $665 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $2,237 23 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,232 39 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,059 21 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $487 18 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $456 5 payments
  6. Amarin Pharma Inc. $375 11 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $374 7 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $315 8 payments
  9. Radius Health, Inc. $301 8 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $270 4 payments
  11. Other $1,720 65 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,755 205 payments
  2. Gift $59 1 payment
  3. Education $12 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NEXLETOL $2,237 23 payments
  2. NEXLIZET $2,137 16 payments
  3. JARDIANCE $1,158 34 payments
  4. Repatha Cardiology $480 10 payments
  5. ENTRESTO $315 8 payments
  6. Vascepa $308 8 payments
  7. TRADJENTA $302 17 payments
  8. Tymlos $301 8 payments
  9. REPATHA Cardiovascular $287 5 payments
  10. GLYXAMBI $257 13 payments
  11. Other $4,631 165 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 114 drugs

Part D claims

6,348

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$229,418

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

17.6%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 50 $57,446
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 17 $23,541
Prolia Denosumab Brand 12 $20,402
Combivent Respimat Ipratropium/Albuterol Sulfate Brand 14 $17,114
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 15 $15,392
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 11 $11,060
Lantus Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 62 $8,790
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 12 $6,410
Synthroid Levothyroxine Sodium Brand 43 $5,549
Novolog Flexpen Insulin Aspart Brand 11 $3,825

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 114 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 32 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$44,644

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

71

Average age 75

Services billed

807

45 women, 26 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 62%
COPD 56%
Arthritis 54%
Diabetes 42%
Depression 39%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Osteoporosis 28%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $269
$269 — —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $37
$37 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $30
$30 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $12
$12 — —
SYNTHROID
  • AbbVie, Inc. $12
$12 43 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

209 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other General Practice in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record