Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Sauter

Neurology Indiana, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1205837051 CMS profile 191056

850 Hospital Rd Ste 2200, Indiana, PA 15701

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$272,797

1,730 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$10,215

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$6,071 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, Michael Sauter of Indiana, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $272,797 across 1,730 general payments and $10,215 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $6,071 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $15,959 219
2024 General $54,587 333
2023 General $27,295 326
2022 General $43,997 237
2021 General $30,216 195
2021 Research $10,215 1
2020 General $47,566 195
2019 General $53,177 225

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Sauter
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Sauter were reported at $15,959. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Michael Sauter Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $53,177 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $47,566 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $30,216 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $43,997 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $27,295 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $54,587 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $15,959 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $68,362 57 payments
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $45,743 350 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $40,127 104 payments
  4. Eisai Inc. $34,793 79 payments
  5. Biogen, Inc. $33,084 115 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $11,891 28 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $11,722 34 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $10,810 164 payments
  9. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $1,280 23 payments
  10. EMD Serono, Inc. $1,254 38 payments
  11. Other $13,731 738 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $165,989 83 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $43,744 14 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $31,300 1,531 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $21,051 80 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $10,045 9 payments
  6. Education $668 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ZEPOSIA $107,623 158 payments
  2. AUSTEDO $43,370 162 payments
  3. Leqembi $34,625 71 payments
  4. TYSABRI $18,422 55 payments
  5. TECFIDERA $12,513 24 payments
  6. OCREVUS $11,680 29 payments
  7. UBRELVY $10,182 123 payments
  8. QULIPTA $7,167 93 payments
  9. UPLIZNA $4,042 15 payments
  10. BRIUMVI $1,280 23 payments
  11. Other $19,837 1,151 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $10,215 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 87 drugs

Part D claims

4,723

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,826,380

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

29%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 40 $335,439
Austedo Xr Deutetrabenazine Brand 34 $194,126
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 36 $190,700
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 29 $157,069
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 20 $148,578
Fingolimod Fingolimod Hcl Brand 23 $145,275
Mayzent Siponimod Brand 13 $124,473
Betaseron Interferon Beta-1b Brand 11 $105,561
Teriflunomide Generic 20 $69,819
Inbrija Levodopa Brand 13 $48,321

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 87 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$41,266

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

299

Average age 73

Services billed

601

155 women, 144 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 63%
Depression 40%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Diabetes 31%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Alzheimer's or dementia 22%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 53 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Leqembi
$22,489 11 —
ZEPOSIA
$13,346 — —
UBRELVY
$2,941 — —
Austedo XR
$500 70 —
BRIUMVI
$494 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 53 with Patron

Records

1,731 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record