Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephanie Nahas-Geiger

Neurology Philadelphia, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1033265004 CMS profile 273882

900 Walnut St, 2Nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$786,019

1,187 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$90,000 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2022

Through program year 2025, Stephanie Nahas-Geiger of Philadelphia, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $786,019 across 1,187 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $90,000 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $69,428 79
2024 General $71,420 144
2023 General $103,784 184
2022 General $33,680 94
2021 General $127,645 103
2020 General $206,042 226
2019 General $174,020 357

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephanie Nahas-Geiger
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephanie Nahas-Geiger were reported at $69,428. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Stephanie Nahas-Geiger Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $174,020 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $206,042 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $127,645 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $33,680 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $103,784 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $71,420 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $69,428 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $217,543 304 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $150,003 268 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $143,346 156 payments
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $120,428 136 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $44,283 67 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $28,930 44 payments
  7. Lundbeck LLC $26,228 33 payments
  8. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $11,186 12 payments
  9. H. Lundbeck A S $10,625 2 payments
  10. Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc. $9,347 15 payments
  11. Other $24,099 150 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $347,836 157 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $322,380 123 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $45,289 175 payments
  4. Honoraria $44,253 13 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $26,059 716 payments
  6. Education $161 2 payments
  7. Grant $42 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AJOVY Central Nervous System $84,057 65 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $75,425 95 payments
  3. AIMOVIG $46,216 89 payments
  4. BOTOX Neuroscience $45,106 56 payments
  5. UBRELVY Neuroscience $40,228 98 payments
  6. EMGALITY $37,377 115 payments
  7. Ajovy Central Nervous System $35,888 60 payments
  8. BOTOX Anti-Migraine $33,605 6 payments
  9. QULIPTA $31,761 73 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $28,795 43 payments
  11. Other $108,782 350 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

1,030

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$435,397

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

39.7%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 72 $128,206
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 56 $74,641
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 73 $58,393
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 44 $53,764
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 41 $27,561
Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 27 $24,538
Reyvow Lasmiditan Succinate Brand 25 $22,132
Dihydroergotamine Mesylate Generic 19 $12,774
Sumatriptan Succinate Generic 126 $11,614
Trintellix Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Brand 13 $6,407

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$35,223

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

177

Average age 64

Services billed

517

124 women, 53 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 56%
Depression 52%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Osteoporosis 22%
Diabetes 19%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
COPD 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 14 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
$15,713 — —
EMGALITY
$15,427 41 —
AJOVY
$5,891 27 —
QULIPTA
$3,743 44 —
VYEPTI
$3,694 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 14 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,187 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record