Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Hait

Rheumatology Dartmouth, MA Medical Doctor

NPI 1326028085 CMS profile 286516

535 Faunce Corner Rd, Dartmouth, MA 02747

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,975

401 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Hait of Dartmouth, MA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,975 across 401 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 68th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,314 109
2024 General $2,203 104
2023 General $686 34
2022 General $1,011 53
2021 General $986 55
2020 General $603 35
2019 General $172 11

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Hait
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Hait were reported at $2,314. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Michael Hait Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $172 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $603 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $986 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,011 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $686 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,203 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,314 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,887 153 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,801 87 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,070 44 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $427 24 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $331 22 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $331 14 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $217 7 payments
  8. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA $169 11 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $154 8 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $147 9 payments
  11. Other $441 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,743 398 payments
  2. Education $232 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,198 114 payments
  2. TREMFYA $797 25 payments
  3. Otezla $532 28 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $493 21 payments
  5. Prolia $414 22 payments
  6. SAPHNELO $402 23 payments
  7. Enbrel Inflammation $364 17 payments
  8. EVENITY $349 19 payments
  9. SKYRIZI $299 17 payments
  10. KEVZARA $289 9 payments
  11. Other $3,759 223 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 99 drugs

Part D claims

8,127

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$3,567,952

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

15.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 124 $752,179
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 85 $702,852
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 62 $418,491
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 57 $411,496
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 29 $209,500
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 34 $183,727
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 22 $150,986
Humira Adalimumab Brand 14 $94,564
Orencia Abatacept Brand 16 $86,966
Otezla Apremilast Brand 23 $77,836

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 99 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 82 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$691,828

Of which drugs: $553,267

Medicare patients

694

Average age 73

Services billed

46,439

491 women, 203 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 40%
Diabetes 31%
Depression 28%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
COPD 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 114 10,740 $213,695
Injection, infliximab-dyyb, biosimilar, (inflectra), 10 mg Q5103 Office 11 1,180 $11,637
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 23 25 $1,813
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 38 190 $961
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 30 362 $246
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 18 53 $26

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $636
$636 62 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $338
$338 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $154
$154 — —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $147
$147 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $128
$128 86 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

401 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Massachusetts

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record