Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Grant

Rheumatology St George, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1154851467 CMS profile 2801369

1490 E Foremaster Dr Ste 220, St George, UT 84790

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,494

481 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Grant of St George, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,494 across 481 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 71st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,477 113
2024 General $3,191 159
2023 General $3,165 172
2022 General $662 37

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Grant
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Grant were reported at $2,477. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Michael Grant Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $662 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,165 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,191 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,477 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,903 98 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,232 73 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,139 49 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $661 40 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $655 36 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $648 28 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $640 34 payments
  8. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $382 13 payments
  9. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $351 18 payments
  10. Organon LLC $344 20 payments
  11. Other $1,541 72 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,996 473 payments
  2. Education $498 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,029 41 payments
  2. Enbrel $930 59 payments
  3. RINVOQ $929 58 payments
  4. Otezla $754 42 payments
  5. SAPHNELO $588 25 payments
  6. Cimzia $544 35 payments
  7. BENLYSTA $542 35 payments
  8. COSENTYX $507 27 payments
  9. TAVNEOS $498 27 payments
  10. ACTHAR $351 18 payments
  11. Other $4,283 216 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

1,947

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,781,646

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

27.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 76 $662,844
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 43 $418,837
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 46 $310,652
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 22 $153,443
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 17 $110,128
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 24 $85,123
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 235 $11,125
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 306 $7,857
Methylprednisolone Generic 213 $4,270
Prednisone Generic 344 $3,957

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 54 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,860,665

Of which drugs: $1,645,113

Medicare patients

550

Average age 73

Services billed

328,976

379 women, 171 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 39%
Depression 27%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Diabetes 21%
Heart failure 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 97 214,600 $779,062
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 22 81,320 $383,033
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 24 6,975 $235,841
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 13 8,300 $75,356
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 11 2,060 $51,445
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 25 4,640 $487
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 18 31 $192

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
$288 — —
Enbrel
$279 43 —
RINVOQ
$253 46 —
TREMFYA
$251 — —
Cimzia
$250 — 214,600

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

481 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record