Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shruti Sanghvi

Rheumatology Vineyard, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1518073220 CMS profile 634032

691 E 400 N, Ste. 110, Vineyard, UT 84058

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$63,291

560 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Shruti Sanghvi of Vineyard, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $63,291 across 560 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,618 118
2024 General $1,860 136
2023 General $8,728 132
2022 General $13,826 98
2021 General $3,979 13
2020 General $8,912 17
2019 General $19,369 46

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shruti Sanghvi
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shruti Sanghvi were reported at $6,618. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Shruti Sanghvi Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $19,369 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $8,912 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $3,979 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $13,826 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $8,728 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,860 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $6,618 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $50,289 157 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $8,172 58 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $2,125 188 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $469 39 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $428 24 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $259 16 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $228 7 payments
  8. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC $221 13 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $158 7 payments
  10. Organon LLC $151 15 payments
  11. Other $791 36 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $34,100 18 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $10,610 45 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $9,317 488 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $8,800 2 payments
  5. Education $464 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ Immunology $37,797 130 payments
  2. TREMFYA $8,122 55 payments
  3. RINVOQ Immunology $7,298 15 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $4,348 26 payments
  5. Otezla $1,229 128 payments
  6. Enbrel $849 88 payments
  7. Cimzia $357 33 payments
  8. TAVNEOS $335 26 payments
  9. COSENTYX $263 17 payments
  10. BENLYSTA $259 16 payments
  11. Other $2,713 154 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 5 drugs

Part D claims

287

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$7,546

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

33.8%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 80 $3,682
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 97 $2,609
Sulfasalazine Generic 13 $544
Prednisone Generic 62 $429
Folic Acid Generic 35 $281

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$931,164

Of which drugs: $820,878

Medicare patients

171

Average age 72

Services billed

92,413

126 women, 45 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 67%
Depression 39%
Osteoporosis 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 19%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 13 8,675 $293,994
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 24 51,800 $187,319
Injection, infliximab-abda, biosimilar, (renflexis), 10 mg Q5104 Office 25 4,120 $94,252
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 76 448 $323

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $301
$301 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $212
$212 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $208
$208 — —
Cimzia
  • UCB, Inc. $174
$174 — 51,800
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $128
$128 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

560 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record