Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Michael Anthony

General Practice Starkville, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1679641450 CMS profile 167104

100 Brandon Rd, Suite S, Starkville, MS 39759

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,228

430 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Michael Anthony of Starkville, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,228 across 430 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $837 42
2024 General $824 43
2023 General $1,022 55
2022 General $1,039 63
2021 General $1,475 92
2020 General $978 64
2019 General $1,053 71

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Michael Anthony
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Michael Anthony were reported at $837. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Michael Anthony General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $1,053 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $978 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $1,475 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $1,039 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $1,022 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $824 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $837 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,357 132 payments
  2. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $731 44 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $718 43 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $415 24 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $373 24 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $350 22 payments
  7. Mylan Specialty L.P. $298 19 payments
  8. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $272 21 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $253 15 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $228 13 payments
  11. Other $1,234 73 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,217 428 payments
  2. Education $12 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,248 71 payments
  2. BREZTRI $602 34 payments
  3. AIRSUPRA $442 22 payments
  4. SOLIQUA 100/33 $416 26 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $394 25 payments
  6. Ozempic $350 22 payments
  7. YUPELRI $298 19 payments
  8. EVENITY $279 18 payments
  9. Prolia $244 16 payments
  10. JARDIANCE Diabetes $242 14 payments
  11. Other $5,237 319 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 168 drugs

Part D claims

13,707

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$854,858

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

22%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 113 $104,197
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 100 $102,634
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 97 $98,823
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 82 $80,110
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 72 $60,571
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 48 $42,233
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 74 $31,820
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 33 $20,430
Humalog Mix 75-25 Kwikpen Insulin Lispro Protamin/Lispro Brand 57 $16,562
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 14 $16,411

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 168 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 78 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$247,354

Of which drugs: $18,145

Medicare patients

617

Average age 75

Services billed

7,030

276 women, 341 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 39%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Cancer 13%
Chronic kidney disease 12%
Heart failure 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 211 211 $17,182
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 13 13 $469
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 26 1,001 $101
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 13 95 $89
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 60 624 $50
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 20 77 $24

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $200
$200 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $145
$145 72 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $110
$110 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $49
$49 — —
OFEV
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $44
$44 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

430 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record