Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Melinda Davis

Physician Assistant Stratford, CT Physician Assistant

NPI 1215346390 CMS profile 11059515

1040 Barnum Ave, Stratford, CT 06614

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,342

528 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Melinda Davis of Stratford, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,342 across 528 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,358 115
2024 General $2,091 101
2023 General $2,203 111
2022 General $1,637 89
2021 General $2,054 112

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Melinda Davis
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Melinda Davis were reported at $2,358. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Melinda Davis Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $2,054 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $1,637 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $2,203 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $2,091 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $2,358 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,923 106 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,091 61 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $813 43 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $647 38 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $559 25 payments
  6. Exact Sciences Corporation $530 20 payments
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $494 24 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $442 25 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $420 22 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $376 19 payments
  11. Other $3,047 145 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,244 518 payments
  2. Education $98 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $849 48 payments
  2. VRAYLAR $820 37 payments
  3. EVENITY $667 30 payments
  4. UBRELVY $665 43 payments
  5. Prolia $560 26 payments
  6. Cologuard Collection Kit $530 20 payments
  7. XIFAXAN $514 25 payments
  8. QULIPTA $384 22 payments
  9. FARXIGA $362 23 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $360 22 payments
  11. Other $7,844 392 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 52 drugs

Part D claims

1,683

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$150,408

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

9.7%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 12 $46,878
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 21 $26,003
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 16 $23,241
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 15 $18,348
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 11 $15,850
Synthroid Levothyroxine Sodium Brand 29 $2,673
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 184 $1,603
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 118 $1,480
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 106 $1,346
Gabapentin Generic 35 $1,154

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 52 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 21 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$17,605

Of which drugs: $1,783

Medicare patients

92

Average age 76

Services billed

321

51 women, 41 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 64%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 25%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Osteoporosis 22%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Depression 18%
Heart failure 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $197
$197 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $179
$179 15 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $150
$150 11 —
REXULTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $116
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $19
$135 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $81
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $45
$126 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

528 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record