Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Taub

Hematology & Oncology Pembroke Pines, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1396784807 CMS profile 244956

12309 Pembroke Rd, Pembroke Pines, FL 33025

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$32,282

1,439 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Matthew Taub of Pembroke Pines, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $32,282 across 1,439 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,631 255
2024 General $5,218 260
2023 General $5,176 237
2022 General $4,388 217
2021 General $5,633 182
2020 General $3,246 147
2019 General $2,990 141

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Taub
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Taub were reported at $5,631. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Taub Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,990 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $3,246 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $5,633 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $4,388 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $5,176 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $5,218 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $5,631 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,782 115 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $2,357 140 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,222 95 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,057 95 payments
  5. Celgene Corporation $1,622 83 payments
  6. Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. $1,556 4 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,546 96 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,247 61 payments
  9. Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,031 11 payments
  10. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $1,022 52 payments
  11. Other $14,842 687 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $29,047 1,410 payments
  2. Honoraria $1,500 1 payment
  3. Education $954 20 payments
  4. Long term medical supply or device loan $781 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Monoferric $1,500 1 payment
  2. KISQALI $1,385 42 payments
  3. KEYTRUDA $1,106 54 payments
  4. OPDIVO $1,050 65 payments
  5. Tavalisse $1,031 11 payments
  6. DARZALEX $963 45 payments
  7. IMBRUVICA $840 31 payments
  8. REBLOZYL $819 38 payments
  9. TALZENNA $630 38 payments
  10. XTANDI $613 38 payments
  11. Other $28,717 1,453 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

934

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$8,772,445

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

61.6%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lenalidomide Generic 125 $1,870,056
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 36 $784,902
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 40 $680,804
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 47 $667,998
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 39 $660,509
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 47 $638,692
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 38 $591,455
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 26 $488,548
Lynparza Olaparib Brand 29 $433,191
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 20 $404,294

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,030,214

Of which drugs: $691,020

Medicare patients

559

Average age 77

Services billed

100,072

293 women, 266 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 55%
Diabetes 46%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 44%
Heart failure 35%
Depression 35%
Atrial fibrillation 31%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 24 40,500 $35,450
Injection, epoetin alfa, (for non-esrd use), 1000 units J0885 Office 12 1,350 $8,755
Injection, granisetron hydrochloride, 100 mcg J1626 Office 11 540 $135
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 25 1,262 $114
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 27 90 $57

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 79 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
$215 — —
REBLOZYL
$208 — —
Pomalyst
$186 36 —
DARZALEX
$175 — —
VENCLEXTA
$170 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 79 with Patron

Records

1,439 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record