Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Smith

Family Medicine Waterloo, IA Medical Doctor

NPI 1609876507 CMS profile 26940

1753 W Ridgeway Ave, Ste 103A, Waterloo, IA 50701

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,358

1,523 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Matthew Smith of Waterloo, IA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,358 across 1,523 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,347 223
2024 General $4,289 227
2023 General $3,718 230
2022 General $3,542 218
2021 General $3,721 241
2020 General $2,874 188
2019 General $2,866 196

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Smith
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Smith were reported at $4,347. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Smith Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,866 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,874 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $3,721 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $3,542 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $3,718 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $4,289 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $4,347 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,751 161 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,853 180 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $2,789 179 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,725 130 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,693 126 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,303 75 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,198 106 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,119 65 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,077 50 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $631 38 payments
  11. Other $7,218 413 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $25,248 1,510 payments
  2. Education $110 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,703 65 payments
  2. UBRELVY $1,698 97 payments
  3. BREZTRI $1,672 61 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT $1,489 80 payments
  5. Otezla $1,319 103 payments
  6. Repatha $1,172 94 payments
  7. XARELTO $1,022 49 payments
  8. ELIQUIS $1,008 61 payments
  9. QULIPTA $917 45 payments
  10. ZAVZPRET $826 46 payments
  11. Other $22,469 1,472 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 132 drugs

Part D claims

9,629

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$567,451

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

19%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 84 $99,639
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 48 $69,224
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 39 $54,063
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 30 $44,995
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 33 $39,989
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 36 $38,613
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 20 $27,565
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 28 $26,929
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 11 $19,616
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 11 $10,439

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 132 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$187,985

Of which drugs: $81,685

Medicare patients

389

Average age 73

Services billed

2,747

139 women, 250 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 58%
Arthritis 29%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Diabetes 20%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
Cancer 13%
Heart failure 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 240 240 $69,833
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 115 115 $9,399
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 26 26 $2,127
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 11 11 $241
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 11 68 $40

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 47 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$321 48 —
NURTEC ODT
$306 — —
BREZTRI
$277 36 —
VOQUEZNA
$240 — —
ZAVZPRET
$231 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 47 with Patron

Records

1,523 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Iowa

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record