Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Nicholas Goetsch

Family Medicine Waterloo, IA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1740287614 CMS profile 214566

3421 W 9Th St, Waterloo, IA 50702

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$524,785

387 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$49,619

Paid to them · 9 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,590,111 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Nicholas Goetsch of Waterloo, IA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $524,785 across 387 general payments and $49,619 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,590,111 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

11 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $68,330 28
2024 General $66,695 30
2024 Research $1,900 1
2023 General $47,870 27
2023 Research $1,900 2
2022 General $72,403 57
2022 Research $37,704 4
2021 General $72,764 47
2021 Research $8,115 2
2020 General $114,589 120
2019 General $82,134 78

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Nicholas Goetsch
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Nicholas Goetsch were reported at $68,330. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Nicholas Goetsch Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $82,134 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $114,589 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $72,764 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $72,403 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $47,870 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $66,695 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $68,330 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $406,857 180 payments
  2. Shire North American Group Inc $58,947 25 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $27,443 86 payments
  4. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $15,885 32 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $14,695 57 payments
  6. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $921 5 payments
  7. CSL Behring $22 1 payment
  8. Genentech USA, Inc. $15 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $464,009 178 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $52,040 31 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $5,824 42 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $2,911 136 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DALVANCE $38,818 124 payments
  2. INVOKANA $15,468 24 payments
  3. AVYCAZ $3,055 13 payments
  4. Seglentis $921 5 payments
  5. XARELTO $453 10 payments
  6. TEFLARO $364 12 payments
  7. Kcentra $22 1 payment
  8. UBRELVY $19 1 payment
  9. Xofluza $15 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $47,719 8 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,900 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

222

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,527

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

18%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cefdinir Generic 22 $427
Ondansetron Odt Ondansetron Brand 28 $277
Cephalexin Generic 29 $206
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 17 $180
Naproxen Generic 33 $113
Prednisone Generic 25 $72
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 11 $67
Amlodipine Besylate Generic 14 $62
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 12 $61
Tramadol Hcl Generic 18 $32

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 7 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$4,225

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

47

Average age 78

Services billed

51

26 women, 21 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Ischemic heart disease 49%
Atrial fibrillation 32%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Diabetes 28%
Depression 28%
Cancer 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DALVANCE
  • AbbVie, Inc. $31
$31 — —
TEFLARO
  • AbbVie, Inc. $31
$31 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

396 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Iowa

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record