Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Shupe

Hematology & Oncology Lincoln, NE Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1629206750 CMS profile 301015

4004 Pioneer Woods Dr, Lincoln, NE 68506

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,547

127 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Matthew Shupe of Lincoln, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,547 across 127 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 49th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $300 15
2024 General $222 12
2023 General $322 18
2022 General $364 11
2021 General $41 3
2020 General $236 13
2019 General $1,062 55

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Shupe
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Shupe were reported at $300. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Shupe Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,062 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $236 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $41 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $364 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $322 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $222 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $300 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $333 12 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $322 17 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $260 17 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $257 8 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $159 9 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $157 8 payments
  7. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $124 6 payments
  8. Eisai Inc. $107 6 payments
  9. Exelixis Inc. $72 3 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $69 4 payments
  11. Other $687 37 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,268 124 payments
  2. Education $279 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $322 17 payments
  2. Venclexta $209 6 payments
  3. TUKYSA $166 10 payments
  4. Lenvima Oncology $107 6 payments
  5. IBRANCE $93 5 payments
  6. INJECTAFER $84 4 payments
  7. JEVTANA $75 4 payments
  8. CABOMETYX $72 3 payments
  9. LENVIMA Oncology $71 5 payments
  10. XPOVIO $62 1 payment
  11. Other $1,318 77 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 14 drugs

Part D claims

260

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$703,487

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

43.8%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 13 $292,835
Lenalidomide Generic 14 $232,755
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 12 $143,869
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 26 $14,656
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 21 $13,948
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 12 $3,510
Anastrozole Generic 45 $464
Dexamethasone Generic 12 $344
Lidocaine-Prilocaine Lidocaine/Prilocaine Brand 26 $285
Potassium Chloride Generic 14 $268

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 14 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 159 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,523,619

Of which drugs: $2,305,693

Medicare patients

684

Average age 75

Services billed

148,146

350 women, 334 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Cancer 48%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Diabetes 32%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Depression 28%
Heart failure 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, pembrolizumab, 1 mg J9271 Office 25 11,000 $495,510
Injection, daratumumab, 10 mg and hyaluronidase-fihj J9144 Office 17 6,660 $262,385
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 32 7,320 $151,938
Injection, immune globulin, (gammagard liquid), non-lyophilized, (e.g., liquid), 500 mg J1569 Office 23 2,330 $83,580
Injection, pegfilgrastim-pbbk (fylnetra), biosimilar, 0.5 mg Q5130 Office 21 384 $58,984
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 33 28,350 $24,636
Injection, aprepitant, 1 mg J0185 Office 39 9,360 $12,610
Injection, epoetin alfa, biosimilar, (retacrit) (for non-esrd use), 1000 units Q5106 Office 12 1,340 $7,747
Injection, leucovorin calcium, per 50 mg J0640 Office 17 597 $2,092
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 62 1,320 $943

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Lenvima
  • Eisai Inc. $54
$54 — —
EPKINLY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $48
$48 — —
IBRANCE
  • PFIZER INC. $29
$29 — —
OPDUALAG
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $19
$19 — —
SARCLISA
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $19
$19 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

127 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record