Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Gubens

Internal Medicine Stanford, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1194923235 CMS profile 99201

269 Campus Dr, Division Of Oncology, Ccsr, Room 1145, Stanford, CA 94305

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$107,996

104 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,196,076 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Matthew Gubens of Stanford, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $107,996 across 104 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,196,076 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $30,909 25
2024 General $13,908 20
2023 General $10,026 11
2022 General $8,341 4
2021 General $7,523 3
2020 General $19,754 24
2019 General $17,535 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Gubens
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Gubens were reported at $30,909. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Gubens Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $17,535 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $19,754 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $7,523 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $8,341 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $10,026 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $13,908 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $30,909 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $39,811 28 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $18,894 26 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $10,448 12 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $9,598 5 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $6,995 3 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $4,940 5 payments
  7. Beckman Coulter, Inc. $4,550 1 payment
  8. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $3,295 4 payments
  9. Roche Diagnostics Corporation $2,976 1 payment
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $2,406 4 payments
  11. Other $4,084 15 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $97,951 38 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $6,005 18 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $2,903 46 payments
  4. Honoraria $1,125 1 payment
  5. Education $11 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TAGRISSO $12,950 8 payments
  2. IMFINZI Oncology $11,792 6 payments
  3. IMFINZI Oncology $11,217 11 payments
  4. RYBREVANT $10,448 12 payments
  5. ALUNBRIG $9,598 5 payments
  6. LIBTAYO $9,401 7 payments
  7. TECENTRIQ $4,882 4 payments
  8. OPDIVO $2,090 1 payment
  9. Alecensa $1,848 2 payments
  10. IMFINZI Cardiovascular And Metabolism $1,663 1 payment
  11. Other $4,142 16 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 9 drugs

Part D claims

189

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$1,450,569

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

49.7%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 44 $716,933
Alecensa Alectinib Hcl Brand 25 $298,809
Tabrecta Capmatinib Hydrochloride Brand 13 $263,868
Mekinist Trametinib Dimethyl Sulfoxide Brand 12 $169,675
Dexamethasone Generic 22 $618
Ondansetron Hcl Generic 30 $362
Prochlorperazine Maleate Generic 21 $228
Prednisone Generic 11 $55
Trazodone Hcl Generic 11 $20

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 45 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$602,973

Of which drugs: $505,326

Medicare patients

218

Average age 74

Services billed

23,591

134 women, 84 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 75%
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 38%
Osteoporosis 26%
COPD 25%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 22%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RYBREVANT
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $5,519
$5,519 — —
TAGRISSO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,477
$1,477 44 —
TECENTRIQ
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $924
$924 — —
Alecensa
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $924
$924 25 —
LIBTAYO
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $88
$88 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

104 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record