Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Goetz

Medical Oncology Rochester, MN Medical Doctor

NPI 1255310611 CMS profile 825726

200 1St St Sw, Rochester, MN 55905

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$136,263

112 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,977,320 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Matthew Goetz of Rochester, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $136,263 across 112 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,977,320 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $34,864 18
2024 General $26,617 14
2023 General $29,743 27
2022 General $8,245 8
2021 General $6,512 12
2020 General $8,965 4
2019 General $21,319 29

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Goetz
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Goetz were reported at $34,864. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Goetz Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $21,319 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $8,965 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $6,512 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $8,245 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $29,743 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $26,617 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $34,864 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $55,071 16 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $39,959 66 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $7,908 5 payments
  4. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. $5,221 4 payments
  5. Genentech, Inc. $4,620 3 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $4,425 5 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $3,800 1 payment
  8. TerSera Therapeutics LLC $3,421 1 payment
  9. Blueprint Medicines Corporation $3,248 2 payments
  10. Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,000 2 payments
  11. Other $5,590 7 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $99,900 38 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $31,282 31 payments
  3. Honoraria $3,248 2 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $1,821 40 payments
  5. Education $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VERZENIO $22,787 30 payments
  2. KISQALI $7,908 5 payments
  3. VENCLEXTA $3,800 1 payment
  4. Itovebi $3,800 1 payment
  5. Zoladex $3,421 1 payment
  6. TUKYSA $2,323 1 payment
  7. Perjeta $410 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 2 drugs

Part D claims

69

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$216,182

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

20.3%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 14 $215,253
Letrozole Generic 55 $929

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 105 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$681,727

Of which drugs: $632,608

Medicare patients

203

Average age 72

Services billed

34,133

120 women, 83 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 61%
Cancer 56%
Arthritis 34%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Diabetes 21%
Depression 20%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, pembrolizumab, 1 mg J9271 Office 17 3,602 $126,493
Injection, daratumumab, 10 mg and hyaluronidase-fihj J9144 Office 16 2,883 $113,029
Injection, fosaprepitant, 1 mg J1453 Office 17 2,700 $295
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 11 118 $257
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 31 340 $223
Injection, paclitaxel, 1 mg J9267 Office 11 2,022 $156
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 38 462 $41
Injection, ondansetron hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2405 Office 27 236 $17
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 18 20 $13

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VERZENIO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $12,887
  • Eli Lilly and Company $1,600
$14,487 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

112 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record