Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Martin Thai

Interventional Pain Medicine Austin, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1871529453 CMS profile 265783

2200 Park Bend Dr Ste 201, Austin, TX 78758

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$23,178

494 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Martin Thai of Austin, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $23,178 across 494 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,567 129
2024 General $5,284 81
2023 General $3,151 68
2022 General $2,731 48
2021 General $740 35
2020 General $494 26
2019 General $2,209 107

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Martin Thai
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Martin Thai were reported at $8,567. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Martin Thai Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,209 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $494 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $740 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $2,731 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $3,151 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $5,284 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $8,567 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $9,971 243 payments
  2. Globus Medical, Inc. $2,893 36 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $2,097 43 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $1,976 33 payments
  5. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $1,430 7 payments
  6. Nevro Corp. $1,150 13 payments
  7. Stryker Corporation $964 6 payments
  8. Painteq LLC $321 5 payments
  9. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $313 4 payments
  10. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $231 12 payments
  11. Other $1,832 92 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,349 476 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $3,553 16 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $1,275 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $2,771 32 payments
  2. General - Pain Management $2,502 65 payments
  3. WaveWriter Alpha Prime 16 $2,116 27 payments
  4. Intracept Pain $1,392 6 payments
  5. Intracept Pain $1,365 5 payments
  6. General - Therapies $1,179 6 payments
  7. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $995 11 payments
  8. SPINEJACK $806 3 payments
  9. OPTABLATE $755 2 payments
  10. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $612 17 payments
  11. Other $8,523 283 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 44 drugs

Part D claims

3,172

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$110,305

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

44.2%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 885 $28,098
Lyrica Pregabalin Brand 11 $10,030
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 14 $7,328
Fentanyl Generic 23 $7,155
Nucynta Er Tapentadol Hcl Brand 11 $7,042
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 230 $6,912
Buprenorphine Generic 22 $5,766
Gabapentin Generic 333 $4,191
Pregabalin Generic 157 $3,978
Tramadol Hcl Er Tramadol Hcl Brand 46 $3,382

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 44 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$228,880

Of which drugs: $1,641

Medicare patients

251

Average age 72

Services billed

4,307

157 women, 94 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 69%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Depression 28%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 113 2,184 $194
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 30 204 $160

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $24
$24 14 —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $17
$17 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $17
$17 — —
HORIZANT
  • CutisPharma, Inc. $17
$17 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

494 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record