Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Ling

Procedural Dermatology Newnan, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1639153638 CMS profile 255422

710 Newnan Crossing Bypass, Suite A, Newnan, GA 30263

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$737

33 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$161,357

Paid to them · 103 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$897,599 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Mark Ling of Newnan, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $737 across 33 general payments and $161,357 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $897,599 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Procedural Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $370 16
2024 General $97 5
2023 General $27 1
2022 General $169 6
2022 Research $946 1
2021 General $45 1
2021 Research $10,380 6
2020 Research $70,106 38
2019 General $30 4
2019 Research $79,925 58

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Ling
  • Procedural Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Procedural Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Ling were reported at $370. Among 381 Procedural Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $592 and the middle half received between $144 and $1,778.

Show as a table
Year Mark Ling Procedural Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $30 $454 $152–$1,260 $163
2020 $0 $243 $90–$835 $114
2021 $45 $337 $102–$1,128 $132
2022 $169 $443 $119–$1,654 $149
2023 $27 $583 $137–$1,838 $160
2024 $97 $611 $132–$1,835 $164
2025 $370 $592 $144–$1,778 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $175 10 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $131 2 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $121 5 payments
  4. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $66 3 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $62 3 payments
  6. Bausch Health US, LLC $45 1 payment
  7. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $43 2 payments
  8. LEO Pharma Inc. $35 2 payments
  9. Botanix SB Inc $24 1 payment
  10. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $20 1 payment
  11. Other $17 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $606 31 payments
  2. Education $131 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. COSENTYX Dermatology $99 5 payments
  2. RINVOQ $88 3 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $78 1 payment
  4. COSENTYX Immunology $63 4 payments
  5. SOTYKTU $62 3 payments
  6. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $52 1 payment
  7. NEMLUVIO $48 2 payments
  8. SKYRIZI $46 2 payments
  9. ADBRY $35 2 payments
  10. SOFDRA $24 1 payment
  11. Other $79 7 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ichnos Sciences Inc. $77,397 43 payments
  2. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc. $56,805 54 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $27,156 6 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

1,240

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,692,668

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

21.9%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 28 $578,296
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 54 $346,269
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 36 $263,834
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 13 $176,891
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 15 $107,381
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 13 $88,550
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 15 $58,080
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 16 $32,558
Acitretin Generic 25 $16,363
Ketoconazole Generic 205 $3,500

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 61 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$163,407

Of which drugs: $2,007

Medicare patients

965

Average age 76

Services billed

4,156

432 women, 533 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 34%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Cancer 16%
Heart failure 12%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $45
$45 15 —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $20
$20 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $15
$15 28 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

136 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Procedural Dermatology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record