Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Kelli Baender

Procedural Dermatology Atlanta, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1093793416 CMS profile 231318

3379 Peachtree Rd. Ne, Suite 500, Atlanta, GA 30326

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,790

358 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Kelli Baender of Atlanta, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,790 across 358 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Procedural Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $253 14
2024 General $2,123 86
2023 General $1,434 63
2022 General $2,843 66
2021 General $933 39
2020 General $623 27
2019 General $1,581 63

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Kelli Baender
  • Procedural Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Procedural Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Kelli Baender were reported at $253. Among 381 Procedural Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $592 and the middle half received between $144 and $1,778.

Show as a table
Year Kelli Baender Procedural Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,581 $454 $152–$1,260 $163
2020 $623 $243 $90–$835 $114
2021 $933 $337 $102–$1,128 $132
2022 $2,843 $443 $119–$1,654 $149
2023 $1,434 $583 $137–$1,838 $160
2024 $2,123 $611 $132–$1,835 $164
2025 $253 $592 $144–$1,778 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,043 83 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,597 12 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $549 20 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $545 20 payments
  5. LEO Pharma Inc. $532 27 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $465 14 payments
  7. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $454 19 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $432 9 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $350 15 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $348 16 payments
  11. Other $2,474 123 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,340 356 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,350 1 payment
  3. Education $100 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. COSENTYX $1,494 6 payments
  2. RINVOQ $973 37 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $808 34 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $533 19 payments
  5. HUMIRA $450 22 payments
  6. OPZELURA $432 9 payments
  7. DUPIXENT Immunology $432 18 payments
  8. ADBRY $382 20 payments
  9. SOTYKTU $317 12 payments
  10. Cimzia $259 8 payments
  11. Other $4,688 233 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

344

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$8,105

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

3.2%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 50 $1,682
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 67 $832
Metronidazole Generic 15 $778
Fluocinonide Generic 19 $705
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 14 $583
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 17 $548
Fluorouracil Generic 11 $538
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 21 $532
Desonide Generic 12 $489
Fluocinolone Acetonide Generic 15 $481

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 62 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$153,803

Of which drugs: $65

Medicare patients

861

Average age 74

Services billed

3,814

438 women, 423 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 59%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Cancer 16%
Diabetes 14%
Osteoporosis 14%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
Chronic kidney disease 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 46 84 $61

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$302 — —
RINVOQ
$220 — —
Bimzelx
$189 — —
ADBRY
$164 — —
OPZELURA
$158 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

358 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Procedural Dermatology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record