Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Jeranko

Rheumatology Longmont, CO Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1114304573 CMS profile 1332973

1715 Iron Horse Dr, Longmont, CO 80501

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,433

241 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mark Jeranko of Longmont, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,433 across 241 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 64th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,890 95
2024 General $1,450 60
2023 General $1,448 61
2022 General $194 2
2020 General $38 3
2019 General $1,415 20

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Jeranko
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Jeranko were reported at $1,890. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Mark Jeranko Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,415 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $38 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $194 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,448 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,450 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,890 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,274 58 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $730 32 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $660 28 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $653 25 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $447 13 payments
  6. Horizon Therapeutics plc $379 11 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $355 8 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $336 7 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $313 14 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $237 15 payments
  11. Other $1,049 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,305 239 payments
  2. Education $128 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SAPHNELO $653 25 payments
  2. Bimzelx $480 16 payments
  3. Otezla $440 24 payments
  4. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $379 11 payments
  5. XELJANZ $355 8 payments
  6. TALTZ $336 7 payments
  7. TREMFYA $310 14 payments
  8. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $297 13 payments
  9. TAVNEOS $290 11 payments
  10. RINVOQ $279 14 payments
  11. Other $3,178 122 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

683

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$294,628

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

37.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 20 $171,393
Forteo Teriparatide Brand 14 $58,907
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 14 $41,142
Tyrvaya Varenicline Tartrate Brand 13 $8,811
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 135 $3,157
Leflunomide Generic 44 $2,375
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 74 $2,288
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 12 $1,732
Prednisone Generic 118 $970
Sulfasalazine Dr Sulfasalazine Brand 24 $858

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$356,272

Of which drugs: $316,378

Medicare patients

192

Average age 73

Services billed

34,795

141 women, 51 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 59%
Osteoporosis 41%
Depression 25%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
COPD 17%
Diabetes 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 19 16,080 $74,587
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 44 2,660 $66,086
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 14 2,710 $24,323
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 12 840 $17,543
Injection, cetirizine hydrochloride, 0.5 mg J1201 Office 20 480 $5,392
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 42 62 $32
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 12 122 $29

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $209
$209 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $178
$178 — —
TAVNEOS
  • Amgen Inc. $173
$173 — —
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $166
$166 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $115
$115 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

241 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record