Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marisa Stringer

Nurse Practitioner Biloxi, MS Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1043327034 CMS profile 11201832

1720A Medical Park Dr, Suite 160, Biloxi, MS 39532

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$68,339

390 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marisa Stringer of Biloxi, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $68,339 across 390 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $12,752 127
2024 General $10,437 68
2023 General $14,920 63
2022 General $18,984 69
2021 General $11,247 63

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marisa Stringer
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marisa Stringer were reported at $12,752. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Marisa Stringer Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $11,247 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $18,984 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $14,920 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $10,437 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $12,752 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Genzyme Corporation $32,423 80 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $30,834 126 payments
  3. Incyte Corporation $1,248 9 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $960 50 payments
  5. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $504 33 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $468 18 payments
  7. Allergan Inc. $373 14 payments
  8. LEO Pharma Inc. $258 8 payments
  9. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $206 7 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $194 6 payments
  11. Other $872 39 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $43,621 34 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $12,759 48 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $8,020 296 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $3,675 6 payments
  5. Education $265 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $51,922 110 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $26,833 100 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $3,844 22 payments
  4. OPZELURA $1,248 9 payments
  5. BOTOX $376 20 payments
  6. RINVOQ $323 8 payments
  7. NEMLUVIO $198 22 payments
  8. SKYRIZI $192 13 payments
  9. COSENTYX $183 9 payments
  10. TREMFYA $176 5 payments
  11. Other $1,833 89 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

398

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$479,058

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

24.4%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 21 $183,150
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 35 $128,627
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 13 $82,537
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 12 $75,631
Fluorouracil Generic 69 $5,012
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 27 $883
Ketoconazole Generic 49 $744
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 11 $502
Imiquimod Generic 16 $467
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 40 $418

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$51,186

Of which drugs: $5,250

Medicare patients

265

Average age 73

Services billed

1,232

184 women, 81 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Depression 25%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Osteoporosis 22%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 12 13 $4,019

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $5,814
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $2,647
$8,461 35 —
OPZELURA
  • Incyte Corporation $1,183
$1,183 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $113
$113 — —
DAXXIFY
  • REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC. $104
$104 — —
CIBINQO
  • PFIZER INC. $97
$97 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

390 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record