Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jo Anna Warren

Nurse Practitioner Jackson, MS Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1730196353 CMS profile 10909278

971 Lakeland Dr, Suite 450, Jackson, MS 39216

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$72,841

994 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Jo Anna Warren of Jackson, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $72,841 across 994 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $24,064 197
2024 General $20,672 211
2023 General $7,075 190
2022 General $17,615 201
2021 General $3,415 195

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jo Anna Warren
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jo Anna Warren were reported at $24,064. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Jo Anna Warren Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $3,415 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $17,615 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $7,075 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $20,672 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $24,064 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $48,372 136 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $11,327 129 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $2,183 136 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,130 74 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $1,103 64 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $916 29 payments
  7. Dexcom, Inc. $807 39 payments
  8. Corcept Therapeutics $774 43 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $704 49 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $584 29 payments
  11. Other $4,942 266 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $45,907 41 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $17,089 919 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $4,789 25 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $3,800 4 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $1,200 3 payments
  6. Education $57 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Ozempic $24,024 77 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $16,400 68 payments
  3. FreeStyle Libre 3 $10,866 86 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $984 56 payments
  5. Korlym $774 43 payments
  6. UBRELVY $716 38 payments
  7. EVENITY $681 41 payments
  8. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $650 30 payments
  9. JARDIANCE $554 39 payments
  10. InPen $535 6 payments
  11. Other $12,062 738 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 100 drugs

Part D claims

7,434

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$3,226,741

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

66%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 474 $617,649
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 663 $408,276
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 312 $387,148
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 292 $279,294
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 183 $157,048
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 128 $107,889
Fiasp Flextouch Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 148 $107,774
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 133 $105,285
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 155 $83,738
Omnipod 5 Dexg7g6 Pods (Gen 5) Insulin Pump Cart,auto,bt,g6/7 Brand 69 $69,650

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 100 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$154,473

Of which drugs: $22,322

Medicare patients

433

Average age 71

Services billed

11,083

246 women, 187 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 38%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Depression 21%
Heart failure 16%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 16 16 $1,309

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Ozempic
$6,750 474 —
RYBELSUS
$4,187 20 —
MOUNJARO
$259 312 —
Korlym
$235 — —
UBRELVY
$231 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

994 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record