Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Maricarmen Quintero

Rheumatology Boynton Beach, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1629064456 CMS profile 255538

6056 Boynton Beach Blvd Ste 145, Boynton Beach, FL 33437

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,287

777 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Maricarmen Quintero of Boynton Beach, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,287 across 777 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,597 124
2024 General $2,586 129
2023 General $2,206 124
2022 General $2,336 140
2021 General $1,145 74
2020 General $432 26
2019 General $1,985 160

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Maricarmen Quintero
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Maricarmen Quintero were reported at $2,597. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Maricarmen Quintero Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,985 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $432 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,145 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,336 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,206 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,586 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,597 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,010 122 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,738 142 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,472 76 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,144 59 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,003 73 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $824 66 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $817 70 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $708 41 payments
  9. Horizon Therapeutics plc $491 30 payments
  10. Radius Health, Inc. $464 21 payments
  11. Other $1,617 77 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,287 777 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,417 100 payments
  2. COSENTYX Immunology $1,004 94 payments
  3. ORENCIA $970 71 payments
  4. COSENTYX Dermatology $854 58 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $817 70 payments
  6. TREMFYA $803 35 payments
  7. XELJANZ $752 60 payments
  8. EVENITY $703 44 payments
  9. Cimzia $497 28 payments
  10. KRYSTEXXA $491 30 payments
  11. Other $5,837 304 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 45 drugs

Part D claims

2,616

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,444,059

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

32.1%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 103 $749,735
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 48 $269,683
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 31 $243,302
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 26 $172,328
Teriparatide Generic 67 $168,118
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 22 $161,977
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 27 $132,303
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 18 $122,608
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 20 $120,521
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 13 $73,337

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 45 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 55 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$858,194

Of which drugs: $713,780

Medicare patients

442

Average age 76

Services billed

69,447

368 women, 74 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Osteoporosis 61%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Depression 31%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Diabetes 24%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 112 8,224 $169,808
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 27 18,698 $161,483
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 12 3,300 $111,850
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 86 658 $492
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 18 86 $411

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$406 — —
COSENTYX
$308 — —
TREMFYA
$245 — —
ORENCIA
$207 48 3,300
KRYSTEXXA
$174 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

777 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record