Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marcus Ortiz

Physician Assistant Knoxville, TN Physician Assistant

NPI 1124303334 CMS profile 4213708

1450 Dowell Springs Blvd Ste 210, Knoxville, TN 37909

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,377

585 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marcus Ortiz of Knoxville, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,377 across 585 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,929 139
2024 General $2,834 165
2023 General $2,271 134
2022 General $1,486 92
2021 General $858 55

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marcus Ortiz
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marcus Ortiz were reported at $1,929. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Marcus Ortiz Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $858 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $1,486 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $2,271 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $2,834 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $1,929 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $2,048 150 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,470 61 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,095 95 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $834 51 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $619 33 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $474 20 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $457 37 payments
  8. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $393 34 payments
  9. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $344 22 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $318 15 payments
  11. Other $1,325 67 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,124 579 payments
  2. Education $254 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. SOTYKTU $2,019 149 payments
  2. TALTZ $834 51 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $728 73 payments
  4. COSENTYX Dermatology $707 25 payments
  5. COSENTYX Immunology $570 26 payments
  6. Bimzelx $542 29 payments
  7. OLUMIANT $503 30 payments
  8. TREMFYA $474 20 payments
  9. EUCRISA $442 36 payments
  10. VTAMA $364 23 payments
  11. Other $3,367 199 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

2,559

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$1,748,407

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

8.9%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 40 $571,745
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 18 $405,899
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 11 $150,073
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 21 $142,183
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 18 $137,288
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 15 $133,984
Otezla Apremilast Brand 19 $91,283
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 14 $52,327
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 392 $19,793
Fluorouracil Generic 227 $16,571

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$144,897

Of which drugs: $574

Medicare patients

819

Average age 73

Services billed

4,460

322 women, 497 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 42%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 17 52 $33

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,034
$1,034 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $329
$329 33 —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $286
$286 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $188
$188 — —
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $169
$169 21 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

585 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record