Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marc Lieberman

Rheumatology Salinas, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1528159092 CMS profile 1147276

224 San Jose St, Salinas, CA 93901

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,624

959 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marc Lieberman of Salinas, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,624 across 959 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,426 132
2024 General $2,485 151
2023 General $2,319 146
2022 General $2,623 170
2021 General $1,802 132
2020 General $1,745 101
2019 General $2,224 127

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marc Lieberman
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marc Lieberman were reported at $2,426. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Marc Lieberman Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,224 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,745 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,802 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,623 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,319 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,485 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,426 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,825 342 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $3,687 209 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,583 94 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,572 110 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,309 74 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,220 52 payments
  7. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $887 8 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $825 38 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $132 4 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC $84 6 payments
  11. Other $499 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,414 952 payments
  2. Education $210 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,651 147 payments
  2. XELJANZ $1,524 105 payments
  3. Otezla $1,418 118 payments
  4. TREMFYA $1,287 64 payments
  5. Enbrel Inflammation $1,198 108 payments
  6. STELARA $1,061 35 payments
  7. COSENTYX $1,026 57 payments
  8. Enbrel Inflammation $1,008 105 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $949 48 payments
  10. SIMPONI ARIA $948 34 payments
  11. Other $6,058 380 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 52 drugs

Part D claims

2,868

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$3,471,161

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

23.7%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 160 $1,357,904
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 52 $387,628
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 42 $364,626
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 61 $361,522
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 34 $233,864
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 17 $178,298
Humira Adalimumab Brand 16 $146,031
Otezla Apremilast Brand 19 $112,303
Hizentra Immun Glob G(Igg)/Pro/Iga 0-50 Brand 13 $108,963
Prolia Denosumab Brand 46 $81,880

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 52 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$123,037

Of which drugs: $141

Medicare patients

411

Average age 72

Services billed

1,832

294 women, 117 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Diabetes 33%
Osteoporosis 32%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Depression 18%
COPD 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 20 26 $77
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 12 620 $59

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Enbrel
$439 103 —
RINVOQ
$420 42 —
TREMFYA
$376 — —
SAPHNELO
$273 — —
XELJANZ
$238 61 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

959 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record