Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Manish Patel

Urology Elgin, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1578559860 CMS profile 343321

40 Pinnacle Pkwy, Suite 104, Elgin, SC 29045

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$213,207

579 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$2,254

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Manish Patel of Elgin, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $213,207 across 579 general payments and $2,254 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Urology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,019 55
2024 General $37,099 88
2023 General $11,680 51
2022 General $38,466 66
2021 General $8,581 95
2020 General $13,724 59
2019 General $95,638 165
2019 Research $2,254 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Manish Patel
  • Urology median
  • Middle half of Urology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Manish Patel were reported at $8,019. Among 9,461 Urology profiles paid that year, the median was $629 and the middle half received between $190 and $1,620.

Show as a table
Year Manish Patel Urology median Middle half National median
2019 $95,638 $480 $147–$1,201 $163
2020 $13,724 $246 $87–$645 $114
2021 $8,581 $358 $111–$1,000 $132
2022 $38,466 $476 $143–$1,263 $149
2023 $11,680 $560 $168–$1,461 $160
2024 $37,099 $563 $170–$1,464 $164
2025 $8,019 $629 $190–$1,620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Coloplast Corp $150,426 234 payments
  2. NeoTract Inc. $18,099 37 payments
  3. Teleflex LLC $17,439 48 payments
  4. Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. $6,187 48 payments
  5. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $3,024 12 payments
  6. Integra LifeSciences Corporation $3,001 3 payments
  7. Derma Sciences, Inc. $2,854 6 payments
  8. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,489 18 payments
  9. Medtronic USA, Inc. $1,452 26 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,432 3 payments
  11. Other $7,804 144 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Royalty or License $69,403 14 payments
  2. Education $47,963 23 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $31,641 460 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $30,991 16 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $19,109 61 payments
  6. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $10,100 4 payments
  7. Honoraria $4,000 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RESTORELLE $75,507 18 payments
  2. Altis Women's Health $62,632 85 payments
  3. UROLIFT $27,056 59 payments
  4. UroLift System $6,847 7 payments
  5. Axonics $5,222 33 payments
  6. ALTIS Female Incontinence $4,531 34 payments
  7. Bulkamid $3,425 18 payments
  8. FLOWABLE $3,001 3 payments
  9. INTEGRA WOUND MATRIX (IWM) $3,001 3 payments
  10. IDRT $3,001 3 payments
  11. Other $32,069 338 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NeoTract Inc. $2,254 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

517

Median for Urology: 1,053

Drug cost

$47,765

Median for Urology: $101,464

Branded share of claims

9.1%

Median for Urology: 27.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 27 $30,487
Methenamine Hippurate Generic 85 $10,024
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 287 $3,913
Silodosin Generic 14 $1,705
Solifenacin Succinate Generic 31 $1,019
Finasteride Generic 41 $334
Oxybutynin Chloride Er Oxybutynin Chloride Brand 20 $178
Oxybutynin Chloride Generic 12 $105

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,221 Part D prescribers listed as Urology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 81 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$464,941

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

399

Average age 75

Services billed

3,947

154 women, 245 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 40%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Cancer 32%
Depression 20%
Atrial fibrillation 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ERLEADA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $103
$103 — —
AKEEGA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $81
$81 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

580 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Urology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record