Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ian Marshall

Urology Charleston, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1255384053 CMS profile 192996

641 Saint Andrews Blvd, Charleston, SC 29407

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$60,103

649 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ian Marshall of Charleston, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $60,103 across 649 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Urology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $11,010 114
2024 General $10,892 117
2023 General $8,603 109
2022 General $13,523 110
2021 General $5,727 82
2020 General $6,469 57
2019 General $3,878 60

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ian Marshall
  • Urology median
  • Middle half of Urology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ian Marshall were reported at $11,010. Among 9,461 Urology profiles paid that year, the median was $629 and the middle half received between $190 and $1,620.

Show as a table
Year Ian Marshall Urology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,878 $480 $147–$1,201 $163
2020 $6,469 $246 $87–$645 $114
2021 $5,727 $358 $111–$1,000 $132
2022 $13,523 $476 $143–$1,263 $149
2023 $8,603 $560 $168–$1,461 $160
2024 $10,892 $563 $170–$1,464 $164
2025 $11,010 $629 $190–$1,620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $17,602 111 payments
  2. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $14,442 63 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $3,921 10 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,726 19 payments
  5. Janssen Global Services, LLC $3,283 2 payments
  6. Boston Scientific Corporation $2,656 26 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $1,642 25 payments
  8. Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC $1,302 44 payments
  9. PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation $1,287 16 payments
  10. Urogen Pharma, Inc. $1,125 21 payments
  11. Other $9,118 312 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $29,060 13 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $20,785 596 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $7,998 31 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $950 1 payment
  5. Honoraria $750 1 payment
  6. Education $560 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ERLEADA $16,941 100 payments
  2. Nubeqa $11,982 53 payments
  3. AKEEGA $4,242 10 payments
  4. XGEVA $2,867 5 payments
  5. Non-Covered $2,441 9 payments
  6. LYNPARZA $2,268 17 payments
  7. SPACEOAR $1,364 6 payments
  8. XTANDI $1,348 51 payments
  9. PROVENGE $1,302 44 payments
  10. TALZENNA $1,260 12 payments
  11. Other $16,343 465 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

2,637

Median for Urology: 1,053

Drug cost

$1,827,228

Median for Urology: $101,464

Branded share of claims

44.3%

Median for Urology: 27.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Erleada Apalutamide Brand 32 $521,166
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 395 $300,203
Orgovyx Relugolix Brand 113 $288,837
Nubeqa Darolutamide Brand 20 $268,821
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 13 $158,027
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 102 $77,978
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 55 $72,301
Xgeva Denosumab Brand 17 $51,903
Mirabegron Er Mirabegron Brand 51 $27,912
Testosterone Generic 56 $10,939

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,221 Part D prescribers listed as Urology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 89 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$351,227

Of which drugs: $159,031

Medicare patients

732

Average age 77

Services billed

14,416

163 women, 569 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Cancer 34%
Diabetes 32%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
Heart failure 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 13 4,801 $97,268
Leuprolide injectable, camcevi, 1 mg J1952 Office 17 1,092 $49,565
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 24 2,345 $247

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ERLEADA
$4,854 32 —
TALZENNA
$986 — —
JELMYTO
$343 — —
PROVENGE
$220 — —
ORGOVYX
$193 113 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

649 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Urology in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record