Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lucy Martin

Dermatology Miami, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1689885691 CMS profile 303768

2645 Sw 37Th Ave, Suite 505, Miami, FL 33133

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,487

132 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$752

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$65,542 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Lucy Martin of Miami, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,487 across 132 general payments and $752 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $65,542 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,949 25
2025 Research $752 1
2024 General $3,278 33
2023 General $1,946 24
2022 General $2,045 23
2021 General $666 13
2020 General $120 1
2019 General $483 13

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lucy Martin
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lucy Martin were reported at $3,949. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Lucy Martin Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $483 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $120 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $666 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,045 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,946 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $3,278 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,949 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,703 19 payments
  2. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited $1,649 4 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,368 10 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,360 12 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,171 13 payments
  6. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $914 8 payments
  7. Incyte Corporation $821 8 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $667 13 payments
  9. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $622 8 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $610 8 payments
  11. Other $1,602 29 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,682 124 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,733 7 payments
  3. Education $72 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $2,618 27 payments
  2. SOTYKTU $954 11 payments
  3. Otezla $867 8 payments
  4. TALTZ $652 13 payments
  5. Zoryve $622 8 payments
  6. OPZELURA $612 6 payments
  7. OLUMIANT $445 4 payments
  8. DUPIXENT $423 8 payments
  9. Bimzelx $328 3 payments
  10. CIBINQO $253 2 payments
  11. Other $1,343 30 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $752 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

847

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$16,854

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

11%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Fluorouracil Generic 29 $3,780
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 87 $3,165
Ketoconazole Generic 149 $1,807
Metronidazole Generic 20 $1,500
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 36 $1,232
Ciclopirox Generic 55 $1,144
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 121 $1,138
Nystatin Generic 40 $487
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 16 $477
Mupirocin Generic 71 $372

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$12,826

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

53

Average age 75

Services billed

268

32 women, 21 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
COPD 38%
Diabetes 34%
Osteoporosis 30%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Depression 26%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,102
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $495
$1,597 — —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $490
$490 — —
Zoryve
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $259
$259 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $250
$250 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $203
$203 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

133 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record