Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lucia Gregorio

Internal Medicine Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1609856004 CMS profile 299318

8410 W Thomas Rd Ste 112, Phoenix, AZ 85037

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,912

542 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lucia Gregorio of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,912 across 542 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $21 1
2024 General $755 41
2023 General $1,078 72
2022 General $1,100 79
2021 General $1,813 101
2020 General $1,598 103
2019 General $2,546 145

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lucia Gregorio
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lucia Gregorio were reported at $21. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Lucia Gregorio Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,546 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,598 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,813 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,100 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,078 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $755 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $21 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,623 124 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,380 63 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,061 76 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $708 54 payments
  5. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $608 32 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $556 28 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $547 31 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $500 29 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $284 19 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $231 9 payments
  11. Other $1,413 77 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,876 537 payments
  2. Education $36 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,196 98 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $888 63 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $790 56 payments
  4. FARXIGA $651 31 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $361 27 payments
  6. Prolia $349 19 payments
  7. TRULICITY $308 23 payments
  8. MOUNJARO $283 22 payments
  9. ELIQUIS $283 13 payments
  10. JARDIANCE Diabetes $275 15 payments
  11. Other $5,418 328 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 143 drugs

Part D claims

11,159

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,447,908

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 125 $189,419
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 97 $185,507
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 107 $124,694
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 90 $114,081
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 50 $104,655
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 65 $88,545
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 64 $66,854
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 51 $66,646
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 56 $57,235
Prolia Denosumab Brand 21 $35,783

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 143 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$75,681

Of which drugs: $1,459

Medicare patients

173

Average age 74

Services billed

1,442

118 women, 55 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 42%
Arthritis 31%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Osteoporosis 27%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Depression 18%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 61 61 $1,336

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $97
$97 107 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $83
$83 23 —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $79
$79 125 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $67
$67 16 —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $65
$65 11 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

542 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record