Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Loren Novak

Family Medicine Vista, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1689601270 CMS profile 75864

1926 Via Ctr, Vista, CA 92081

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,991

679 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Loren Novak of Vista, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,991 across 679 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,066 79
2024 General $1,683 79
2023 General $2,109 98
2022 General $4,242 116
2021 General $2,231 114
2020 General $1,958 91
2019 General $1,702 102

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Loren Novak
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Loren Novak were reported at $2,066. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Loren Novak Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,702 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,958 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,231 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $4,242 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,109 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,683 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,066 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $2,031 12 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,662 78 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,448 69 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,433 64 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $825 36 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $786 41 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $782 40 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $661 29 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $609 30 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $585 30 payments
  11. Other $5,170 250 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,354 670 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,200 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $335 3 payments
  4. Education $101 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT $2,055 14 payments
  2. FARXIGA $1,196 52 payments
  3. Prolia $853 38 payments
  4. EVENITY $836 37 payments
  5. UBRELVY $682 27 payments
  6. Kerendia $661 29 payments
  7. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $552 29 payments
  8. XARELTO $524 26 payments
  9. Repatha $473 26 payments
  10. VRAYLAR $434 28 payments
  11. Other $11,040 555 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 164 drugs

Part D claims

11,271

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,052,647

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

21.7%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 321 $127,920
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 97 $103,518
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 114 $81,983
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 85 $73,527
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 47 $63,918
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 83 $54,082
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 11 $51,361
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 37 $43,694
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 51 $43,295
Evenity (2 Syringes) Romosozumab-Aqqg Brand 18 $42,770

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 164 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 54 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$242,226

Of which drugs: $62,767

Medicare patients

510

Average age 78

Services billed

6,953

265 women, 245 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Depression 37%
Diabetes 32%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Atrial fibrillation 29%
Osteoporosis 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 25 1,862 $34,085
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 49 49 $3,999
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 15 72 $54

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $179
$179 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $170
$170 17 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $121
$121 97 —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $49
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $30
  • Lundbeck LLC $24
$103 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $54
$54 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

679 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record