Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lindsay Cunningham

Rheumatology Tulsa, OK Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1366709354 CMS profile 1305739

2622 E 21St St Ste 1, Tulsa, OK 74114

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,760

214 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lindsay Cunningham of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,760 across 214 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 51st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $22 1
2024 General $119 1
2023 General $91 2
2022 General $217 12
2021 General $499 31
2020 General $369 28
2019 General $1,442 139

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lindsay Cunningham
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lindsay Cunningham were reported at $22. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Lindsay Cunningham Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,442 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $369 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $499 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $217 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $91 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $119 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $22 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $919 70 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $411 25 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $251 14 payments
  4. Horizon Therapeutics plc $243 18 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $173 15 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $172 23 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $170 18 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $137 19 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $119 1 payment
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $53 3 payments
  11. Other $112 8 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,597 211 payments
  2. Education $163 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $688 42 payments
  2. HUMIRA $486 42 payments
  3. KRYSTEXXA $214 14 payments
  4. Rituxan $172 23 payments
  5. Enbrel $171 17 payments
  6. SIMPONI ARIA $170 18 payments
  7. Prolia $169 17 payments
  8. Actemra $163 21 payments
  9. Cimzia $162 14 payments
  10. STELARA $153 17 payments
  11. Other $1,212 68 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

831

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$316,150

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

34.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 21 $186,187
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 14 $95,842
Leflunomide Generic 140 $12,527
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 216 $8,426
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 195 $6,001
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 17 $2,539
Azathioprine Generic 28 $1,359
Sulfasalazine Dr Sulfasalazine Brand 25 $925
Colchicine Generic 12 $657
Prednisone Generic 72 $524

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,693,562

Of which drugs: $1,555,744

Medicare patients

207

Average age 73

Services billed

145,990

154 women, 53 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Diabetes 23%
Depression 20%
Osteoporosis 17%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 23 12,850 $435,934
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 31 31,400 $283,633
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 15 49,600 $166,691
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 11 4,750 $118,419

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEVZARA
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $119
$119 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

214 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record