Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Li Liu

Internal Medicine Monterey Park, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1295722627 CMS profile 12783

210 N Garfield Ave, Suite 203, Monterey Park, CA 91754

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,310

852 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Li Liu of Monterey Park, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,310 across 852 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,384 138
2024 General $3,823 145
2023 General $3,350 149
2022 General $3,221 146
2021 General $2,536 133
2020 General $1,622 78
2019 General $1,376 63

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Li Liu
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Li Liu were reported at $3,384. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Li Liu Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,376 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,622 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,536 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,221 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,350 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,823 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,384 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,933 108 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,842 131 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,397 60 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,237 58 payments
  5. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $934 58 payments
  6. Almatica Pharma LLC $817 39 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $758 27 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $714 31 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $607 27 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $591 26 payments
  11. Other $6,481 287 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,299 851 payments
  2. Education $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,491 71 payments
  2. Repatha $1,303 54 payments
  3. Prolia $1,242 60 payments
  4. Ozempic $1,224 56 payments
  5. EVENITY $1,211 67 payments
  6. XIFAXAN $1,030 49 payments
  7. CREON $991 47 payments
  8. LOREEV XR $817 39 payments
  9. ZENPEP $810 32 payments
  10. LINZESS $725 34 payments
  11. Other $15,472 728 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 224 drugs

Part D claims

26,907

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,923,828

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

27%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 1,046 $382,254
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 407 $281,059
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 174 $194,337
Prolia Denosumab Brand 108 $183,777
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 211 $182,692
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 214 $179,029
Vemlidy Tenofovir Alafenamide Brand 117 $169,962
Diclofenac Epolamine Generic 134 $165,109
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 158 $154,742
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 240 $153,205

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 224 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 36 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$402,109

Of which drugs: $26,260

Medicare patients

494

Average age 80

Services billed

7,212

308 women, 186 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 58%
Chronic kidney disease 58%
Osteoporosis 54%
Depression 42%
Ischemic heart disease 38%
Arthritis 34%
COPD 30%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 268 268 $21,928
Pneumococcal vaccine for injection into muscle 90670 Office 16 16 $4,045
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 34 146 $126
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 60 72 $1

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$433 52 —
ZENPEP
$248 86 —
XIFAXAN
$237 12 —
LEQVIO
$236 — —
TYRVAYA
$202 57 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

852 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record